A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Post by Smitty-48 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:36 pm

Except contrary to popular hysteria, the F-35 is a bad ass mamma jamma which will eat F-16's and every other 4Gen for breakfast, without even seeing it coming nor going, it's already doing so at Red Flag, tested against worse than real world conditions, the F-35s are in and out with impunity, same as the F-22.

And all that for the same price as an F-16E/F Block 60.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:42 pm

DBTrek wrote:Give the Queen my address please, and ask her how much for a quarter Oz. Or 16 grams. Or .2173 stone, or whatever weird measurement the Brits use these days.
:clap:
We use the Awqiyyah now.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Post by Smitty-48 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:48 pm

Like, yes, stealth and sensor fusion is expensive and complex, and like all expensive complex military hardware, there are glitches, but reality check; if/when the Americans bring the F-35 against as a holistic force against the projected adversaries, it's gonna be ugly for those adversaries, the F-35 will pummel them with impunity.

When it happens, nobody is gonna be crying about the price of the F-35, it's gonna be Merica fuck yeah this, and Merica fuck yeah that, all over and up and down.
Nec Aspera Terrent

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Post by Smitty-48 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:58 pm

Bear in mind, when the F-15 came out in the 70's, the same phony baloney "reformers" cried that it was an "overpriced, overly complex piece of junk that would be totally useless in a shooting war", after it went 100-0 against the Soviet made adversaries, pummeled. them. with. impunity. that put an end to that right quick.

It's the leftards of Mother Jones Magazine & Co who are running this smear campaign, same as it was in the 70's; wise up already.

The socialist peaceniks of the far left are not in favour of any military procurement, no matter what fighter jet you put in front them, they would come up with fallacies to trash it as a horrible catastrophe in the liberal media, who knew?

Mother Jones > POGO > Liberal Media > Internet Clickbait, that's what's going on here, don't drink the kool-aid.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:25 pm

ssu wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:The F-16 has jack shit. It's just a fly-by-wire system. Electronic failure of it's primitive flight control system results in lawn dart. Engine failure results in lawn dart. Failure of many kinds, that to an F-15 pilot would be a nuisance, result in lawn dart.

The F-16 is a fucking lawn dart, and the F-35 is it's lawn dart descendant.
And guess which twin engined aircraft has the best stats with Class A mishaps per 100k flight hours?

(From USAF statistics)
Multiengine Class A mishaps

B-52 1,68 historical, last 10 years 0,4

Twin engined Class A mishaps:

F-15 0,66
F-22 0,57
F-111 0,49
F-117 0,48
F-4 0,16
A-10 0,09 :dance:

Compare those above to single engined:

F-104 9,48 (Yep, Starfighter was deadly)
F-100 5,61
F-105 4,56
A-7 1,73
F-16 (F-100/200) 1,84
F-16 (F-110/129) 0,84

Now just to put these statistics into perspective, here's the historical NAVAL AVIATION class A mishaps per 100k Flight Hours table. That start with over 50 mishaps / 100k hrs, so compared to that the Starfighter was safe.

Image

And btw there's another interesting statistic about the flight hours:

Cumulative Flight Hours On Active MDS
A-10 (TF34)10,707,795 EFH :dance:
F-15 (F220)4,241,715 EFH
F-15 (F229)1,205,765 EFH
F-22 (F119) 523,201 EFH

So the A-10 fleet has flown TWICE as much as F-15 Eagles and 20 times more than the few Raptors. And there have been a lot more Eagles in the USAF inventory than A-10s.

Bitch however much you want about it and praise the F-35 as long as you want, but A-10 is a good aircraft! :whistle:
You know how d our B-52s are? The youngest ones are from about 1960.

Literally antiques at this point.

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Post by nmoore63 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 10:52 pm

Smitty-48 wrote:Like, yes, stealth and sensor fusion is expensive and complex, and like all expensive complex military hardware, there are glitches, but reality check; if/when the Americans bring the F-35 against as a holistic force against the projected adversaries, it's gonna be ugly for those adversaries, the F-35 will pummel them with impunity.

When it happens, nobody is gonna be crying about the price of the F-35, it's gonna be Merica fuck yeah this, and Merica fuck yeah that, all over and up and down.
The F-35 will be incredible against anything.... until it actually matters.

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Post by Smitty-48 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:06 pm

nmoore63 wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote:Like, yes, stealth and sensor fusion is expensive and complex, and like all expensive complex military hardware, there are glitches, but reality check; if/when the Americans bring the F-35 against as a holistic force against the projected adversaries, it's gonna be ugly for those adversaries, the F-35 will pummel them with impunity.

When it happens, nobody is gonna be crying about the price of the F-35, it's gonna be Merica fuck yeah this, and Merica fuck yeah that, all over and up and down.
The F-35 will be incredible against anything.... until it actually matters.
Ah well, there's plenty of Imperial Policing to be done between wars of Hegmonic Succession, not to mention cornering the market for the American Military Industrial Complex. Lockheed Martin shareholders, do of course approve.
Nec Aspera Terrent

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Post by nmoore63 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:46 pm

Smitty-48 wrote:
nmoore63 wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote:Like, yes, stealth and sensor fusion is expensive and complex, and like all expensive complex military hardware, there are glitches, but reality check; if/when the Americans bring the F-35 against as a holistic force against the projected adversaries, it's gonna be ugly for those adversaries, the F-35 will pummel them with impunity.

When it happens, nobody is gonna be crying about the price of the F-35, it's gonna be Merica fuck yeah this, and Merica fuck yeah that, all over and up and down.
The F-35 will be incredible against anything.... until it actually matters.
Ah well, there's plenty of Imperial Policing to be done between wars of Hegmonic Succession, not to mention cornering the market for the American Military Industrial Complex. Lockheed Martin shareholders, do of course approve.
of all people on here, you really think I don’t profit from the MIC?

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Post by Smitty-48 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:49 pm

nmoore63 wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote:
nmoore63 wrote: The F-35 will be incredible against anything.... until it actually matters.
Ah well, there's plenty of Imperial Policing to be done between wars of Hegmonic Succession, not to mention cornering the market for the American Military Industrial Complex. Lockheed Martin shareholders, do of course approve.
of all people on here, you really think I don’t profit from the MIC?
Did I say that? I don't recall saying that.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: A-10C Thunderbolt II makes a comeback

Post by Hastur » Thu Jan 25, 2018 1:04 am

Multirole is the only logical way forward if you don't have unlimited money. That said it can sometimes be economic to keep existing platforms in a limited role until upkeep becomes unsustainable. The challenge is to resist the tendency to give in to nostalgia. Recognize when the time has come to stop throwing good money after bad. That is a hard decision to make for any business and for individuals as well. The sunk cost fallacy is the most common economic error we make as humans.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck