Degenerate Faggots Starting Civil War2.0

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by C-Mag » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:18 am

Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14793
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by The Conservative » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:20 am

C-Mag wrote:Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by C-Mag » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:23 am

The Conservative wrote:
C-Mag wrote:Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.
Someone name me the last time a 'Right wing' or Conservative or Bubba mob went into the streets, rioted, beat people and murdered people. Name it, because frankly, I can't. However I can rattle of this type of violent intolerant behavior from the Lefties.


In the US, don't get cute.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:37 am

C-Mag wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
C-Mag wrote:Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.
Someone name me the last time a 'Right wing' or Conservative or Bubba mob went into the streets, rioted, beat people and murdered people. Name it, because frankly, I can't. However I can rattle of this type of violent intolerant behavior from the Lefties.


In the US, don't get cute.
Do you even history, bro?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot
On May 31 and June 1, 1921, a white mob started the Tulsa race riot, attacking residents and businesses of the African-American community of Greenwood in Tulsa, Oklahoma,[1] in what is considered one of the worst incidents of racial violence in United States History.[2] The attack, carried out on the ground and by air, destroyed more than 35 blocks of the district, at the time the wealthiest black community in the nation. More than 800 people were admitted to hospitals and more than 6,000 black residents were arrested and detained, many for several days.[3] The Oklahoma Bureau of Vital Statistics officially recorded 39 dead, but the American Red Cross estimated 300, a number supported by historians since then. Most were black.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_draft_riots
The New York draft riots (July 13–16, 1863), known at the time as Draft Week,[3] were violent disturbances in Lower Manhattan, widely regarded as the culmination of working-class discontent with new laws passed by Congress that year to draft men to fight in the ongoing American Civil War. The riots remain the largest civil and racial insurrection in American history, aside from the Civil War itself.[4]
I'm assuming you meant "in the US", because Europe has had tons of them in the last few years.
Last edited by SuburbanFarmer on Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Xenophon » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:38 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
C-Mag wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.
Someone name me the last time a 'Right wing' or Conservative or Bubba mob went into the streets, rioted, beat people and murdered people. Name it, because frankly, I can't. However I can rattle of this type of violent intolerant behavior from the Lefties.


In the US, don't get cute.
Do you even history, bro?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot
On May 31 and June 1, 1921, a white mob started the Tulsa race riot, attacking residents and businesses of the African-American community of Greenwood in Tulsa, Oklahoma,[1] in what is considered one of the worst incidents of racial violence in United States History.[2] The attack, carried out on the ground and by air, destroyed more than 35 blocks of the district, at the time the wealthiest black community in the nation. More than 800 people were admitted to hospitals and more than 6,000 black residents were arrested and detained, many for several days.[3] The Oklahoma Bureau of Vital Statistics officially recorded 39 dead, but the American Red Cross estimated 300, a number supported by historians since then. Most were black.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_draft_riots
The New York draft riots (July 13–16, 1863), known at the time as Draft Week,[3] were violent disturbances in Lower Manhattan, widely regarded as the culmination of working-class discontent with new laws passed by Congress that year to draft men to fight in the ongoing American Civil War. The riots remain the largest civil and racial insurrection in American history, aside from the Civil War itself.[4]
Ok, now recent history.

Dand
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:57 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Dand » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:38 am

a century ago

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:40 am

The Conservative wrote:
C-Mag wrote:Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.
Life isn't fair. Welcome.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Xenophon » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:41 am

Dand wrote:a century ago
Nah man, like, remember the Nika riots against Justinian? Those were like, so analogous to what's going on now, man. Like, cultures don't have any effect on people, man. It's, like, all the elites, keeping us down.

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Xenophon » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:42 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
C-Mag wrote:Wearing a stupid red hat is still covered as free speech in this country isn't it, you shouldn't be beaten or killed if you want to wear a stupid red hat. Because if that's acceptable, there is little as stupid as pink cunt hats.
You also shouldn't be nearly killed, or have your lively hood destroyed just because you park in the wrong place, or didn't support a looser.
Life isn't fair. Welcome.
Why do you always default to the "whatevs man, life sucks" argument after having your arguments refuted?

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:43 am

Xenophon wrote:
Xenophon wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
All I've said that would resemble an ideological cleansing is that the authorities need to crack down on anarchist rioters. If you have a problem with that, you and your 6'2, well-built frame can go pound sand. Defense isn't always "wait until they punch you in the face or hit you with a pipe". I'm sure you don't understand that, given your only combat experience comes from hip-tossing teenagers in your karate class, or whatever martial art it is you threatened Smitty with on the DCF.
I agree that the MAGA moron had every right to defend himself. But that's not what you're discussing. You're talking about why a mob of military police didn't descend on the scene and stop it. I'm saying it was a wise move.

I also agree that rioters need to be stopped. However, they didn't reach an unacceptable level of violence, IMO - with a single exception. This was not a city-wide mob scene, this was a few dozen people acting like animals for a few hours. It could have been much, much worse.

And yes, you guys are constantly using masturbating over the idea of lamppost hangings and firing squads to 'destroy the cancer' of people that think differently than you. Your bullshit is being heard by millions of people, and will create more reactions like this. It's inevitable.
No. I advocated an appropriate response to dangerous rioters destroying property and fighting people in the street. I said nothing about military police. They would only be called in to police a civilian population under martial law (in the US).

It could have been worse. Everything can be worse. "Oh, I just got robbed, but at least he didn't chain me to the back of his Trans-Am and drag me down a dirt road."

I have not once said to hang these people. I have never said that they need to be shot via firing squad. Do not project others views upon me. You're engaging with me now, Grumps. Don't get sidetracked.
I'm speaking to the larger Right faction on this board, and by extension, the country. You've seen it, you're part of it, you know exactly what I'm talking about. Most of the responses to my posts are to the larger Left, and I get tarred with all kinds of Socialist/Marxist/Bullshit labels. Turnabout and all that.

Even if I'm only referring to you yourself, you have no issue painting "Them" as pussies that can't fight, can't shoot a gun, aren't dangerous... yet here you are clutching pearls when some windows get smashed, and calling for a violent crackdown. Ironic.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0