Protecting the Free-Range Kid

User avatar
DrYouth
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Canadastan

Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid

Post by DrYouth » Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:17 am

Smitty-48 wrote:That's why it's hi-larious, when DrY starts prattling on about the "ruling class", as if it was somebody else, when in fact, he is the ruling class here, that's who runs shit here, Dr. Youth & Co, he's an Institutional Elite, and while he lives out west, he's not from there, he's a Laurentian Elite from back east, whatever he tells you about the "ruling class" and the "dickensian suffering of the proletariat", don't be suckered by that shit, you're talking to the Canadian ruling class, when you're talking to Dr. Youth, and there is no proletariat class here, these Laurentian Elites never cease with the fabricated sob stories to justify their existence on the taxpayers dime, but they're totally full of shit, make no mistake.
:lol:

Looks like it's rabbit season again...

Not only that but that rabbits rule the forest.

What's up doc, indeed!

:lol:
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:07 am

Notice that non-denial denial, folks?


Busted.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:17 am

Smitty-48 wrote:Notice that non-denial denial, folks?


Busted.
To be clear, anyone that doesn't bother to argue your latest nonsense is 'busted'? Well shit...

Image
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Kazmyr
Posts: 811
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid

Post by Kazmyr » Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:18 am

Boy, after reading this thread, I'm really looking forward to my daughter getting older.

:lol:
Martin Hash wrote:Liberty allows people to get their jollies any way they want. Just don't expect to masturbate with my lotion.

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:43 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote:Notice that non-denial denial, folks?


Busted.
To be clear, anyone that doesn't bother to argue your latest nonsense is 'busted'? Well shit...
He has no argument against being a Laurentian Elite, he knows who he is, he has no defence against the charge, he merely pleads Champers Bolshie, this is what the Kneedippers are, the Laurentian Elites who must have a fig leaf of "social justice" as political cover for their elitism.

Not quite Treason, Marxism and Pussies, they are Cultural Marxists, and Pussies, but not treasonous against the Crown, as they are elitists after all, and they do recognize that the Crown is the only thing standing between them and a republic of yayhoos.

This is why they still have some use for the likes of me, even though they find us to be wholly unsavoury and probably dangerous, they still need a praetorian guard, to protect the Nanny in their Nanny State, come what may.
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Thu Dec 22, 2016 12:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
ssu
Posts: 2142
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:05 pm

Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid

Post by ssu » Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:58 am

Quick poll,

Who here walked / took the bus alone to school in primary school (starting from first grade)? Or could play outside with friends for a long time without adult supervision under 10 years?

It was the norm here when I was young. Actually, going to school alone is very typical even nowdays.
Image

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Dec 22, 2016 12:04 pm

ssu wrote:Quick poll,

Who here walked / took the bus alone to school in primary school (starting from first grade)? Or could play outside with friends for a long time without adult supervision under 10 years?

It was the norm here when I was young. Actually, going to school alone is very typical even nowdays.
In grade one? Yes, I must have been walking to school, because I stole a hundred dollars from my father, then I panicked, and gave it to the Chinese kid on the walk home, to get rid of the evidence, and the Chinese family called my parents and said "why you kid give our kid hundred dollars, roundeye?!" Can't remember much about grade one, but that was one of the more memorable fiascoes.

Bear in mind, a hundred dollars then was like five hundred dollars now, so that was in fact the Christmas money which I stole, so that was by far and away the most pissed off my father had been towards me at that point in my young life. Ahr well, live and learn.

My mother said that I simply did not like school at all, didn't like the teachers, didn't understand why I was being sent to this prison, and as soon as they starting sending me, I started to insurge against them by causing all sorts of trouble.
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Thu Dec 22, 2016 12:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Kazmyr
Posts: 811
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid

Post by Kazmyr » Thu Dec 22, 2016 12:18 pm

Walked to the bus stop, biked to friend's houses/local convenience store, or even off to the local ponds to go fishing. No adult supervision required.

Only rules were don't do anything really, really stupid and be home by a certain time (give or take an hour or two).

Not nearly as cool or hilarious as Danger Smitty, though. :lol:
Martin Hash wrote:Liberty allows people to get their jollies any way they want. Just don't expect to masturbate with my lotion.

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Dec 22, 2016 12:28 pm

Indeed, I was pretty much non stop trouble, from grade one until I dropped out of school to join the army, was only Her Majesty the Queen, who could bring Danger Smitty to heel, and still is really.

I was right about those teachers though, wasn't long before they were slapping us, then punching us, then kicking us, what a teacher could get away with, in the age of free reign, would get them locked in the penitentiary now, for a very long stay indeed.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Protecting the Free-Range Kid

Post by BjornP » Thu Dec 22, 2016 12:38 pm

ssu wrote:Quick poll,

Who here walked / took the bus alone to school in primary school (starting from first grade)? Or could play outside with friends for a long time without adult supervision under 10 years?

It was the norm here when I was young. Actually, going to school alone is very typical even nowdays.
In first grade, me and my older brother (two years older) took the train by ourselves (20 min ride) to the town where school was. I don't live in the Danish equivalent of the sticks anymore, but in the little town I've worked in these past eight months, the kids rode their bikes around town without adults around alot compared to here in Aalborg. Not sure if it means we're getting safety-obsessed more in the cities, or if families raising their kids in cities here just never let them roam very far.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.