Net Neutrality

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by StCapps » Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:27 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:You keep plugging your ears, genius. Broadband in America, in most places, is a monopoly just like the power utility. The only reason Comcast got away with throttling my Netflix to be unusable was that I had no choice in service. It was Comcast broadband or not broadband.
Obama's "Net Neutrality" did nothing to address monopolies, you keep acting like it does, but it didn't, you're the one with your fingers in your ears. Your Net Neutrality law has nothing to do with trust busting, stop falling for Democrat talking points.
*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:44 pm

LMFAO. Of course it did. It forbade a specific monopolistic practice.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by StCapps » Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:52 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:LMFAO. Of course it did. It forbade a specific monopolistic practice.
No, it did not. Do your research closet Demohack.
*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:53 pm

StCapps wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:LMFAO. Of course it did. It forbade a specific monopolistic practice.
No, it did not. Do your research closet Demohack.

If there was competition, do you think I would have continued to pay for Comcast broadband when they decided to render my Netflix subscription useless?

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by StCapps » Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:55 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:LMFAO. Of course it did. It forbade a specific monopolistic practice.
No, it did not. Do your research closet Demohack.

If there was competition, do you think I would have continued to pay for Comcast broadband when they decided to render my Netflix subscription useless?
There was no competition before Obama's Net Neutrality, there isn't after it became the law of the land, and there isn't now that Trump is killing the stupid thing. Obama's Net Neutrality did not address the issue, whatsoever, he just pretended it did, to sell it to the rubes in the American public, and it worked. It's still working on rubes like you, sad.
*yip*

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Fife » Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:58 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:LMFAO. Of course it did. It forbade a specific monopolistic practice.
No, it did not. Do your research closet Demohack.

If there was competition, do you think I would have continued to pay for Comcast broadband when they decided to render my Netflix subscription useless?
A posteriori "economics," everyone.

:lol:
Last edited by Fife on Fri Dec 29, 2017 8:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by StCapps » Fri Dec 29, 2017 8:00 pm

Fake Net Neutrality is merely an obvious FCC power grab, even though StA cannot see it.

He's easily fooled by Orwellian Doublespeak I suppose, call it Net Neutrality, and he just assumes it's the real deal, and not an obvious imposter using a good idea to sell a bad one.

Real Net Neutrality would be a good idea, Obama didn't sign such legislation into law though, quit fronting like he did.
/shrugs
Last edited by StCapps on Fri Dec 29, 2017 8:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Dec 29, 2017 8:04 pm

Fife wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:
StCapps wrote:No, it did not. Do your research closet Demohack.

If there was competition, do you think I would have continued to pay for Comcast broadband when they decided to render my Netflix subscription useless?
A posteriori "economics," everyone.

:lol:

So you think competition is going to magically appear when Comcast starts throttling people's Netflix accounts again? That's cute. When we tried to do that last time, they actually bribed state legislators to make it illegal, so I don't know why you think this time will be different.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Dec 29, 2017 8:05 pm

StCapps wrote:Fake Net Neutrality is merely an obvious FCC power grab, even though StA cannot see it.

He's easily fooled by Orwellian Doublespeak I suppose, call it Net Neutrality, and he just assumes it's the real deal, and not an obvious imposter using a good idea to sell a bad one.

Real Net Neutrality would be a good idea, Obama didn't sign such legislation into law though, quit fronting like he did.
/shrugs

What I can see are a lot of dummies defending the idea that it is perfectly okay (and a good thing) for monopolies to use their monopolistic powers to fuck with the free market by creating barriers to entry. You literally defended it. Don't try to obfuscate this. This is what you defend.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Net Neutrality

Post by StCapps » Fri Dec 29, 2017 8:07 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
StCapps wrote:Fake Net Neutrality is merely an obvious FCC power grab, even though StA cannot see it.

He's easily fooled by Orwellian Doublespeak I suppose, call it Net Neutrality, and he just assumes it's the real deal, and not an obvious imposter using a good idea to sell a bad one.

Real Net Neutrality would be a good idea, Obama didn't sign such legislation into law though, quit fronting like he did.
/shrugs

What I can see are a lot of dummies defending the idea that it is perfectly okay (and a good thing) for monopolies to use their monopolistic powers to fuck with the free market by creating barriers to entry. You literally defended it. Don't try to obfuscate this. This is what you defend.
No, that isn't what I am defending. I just don't pretend that Obama's Fake Net Neutrality is something that it isn't, you on the other hand refuse to not pretend. To you, if you don't think Obama's Fake Net Neutrality is the real mccoy, then somehow you're defending monopolies. Clown.

You're defending an FCC power grab, just because Obama called it "Net Neutrality". Stop pointing fingers and look in the mirror.
*yip*