Degenerate Faggots Starting Civil War2.0

User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Ex-California » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:02 am

My people are losing it :shock:

Image

But have you seen the girl who got pepper sprayed? She can move down South and I'll take care of her :mrgreen:

Putting on my tinfoil hat though, I could almost see her being a plant from Milo's side to drum up sympathy. She's almost too good to be true
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session

User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Ex-California » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:04 am

I gotta have my brother buy me a gun.

He's a cop so he can get the good stuff
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Xenophon » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:04 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Yes, clearly this is a socialist idea. :roll:

How'd that work out in Fergusen btw? More dead kids, weeks of unrest, billions lost...

In this case we have a couple of busted storefronts and 1 dead idiot. I call it a win.

Sending in hundreds of armed thugs to fight the hundreds of armed thugs does not stop violence.
Are you an idiot? 10 civilians and 6 police being injured does not equal dead kids.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14794
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by The Conservative » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:06 am

C-Mag wrote:These bitches are starting to get 60s crazy.
The 60's were bad, this is worse... the 60's had a reason... this is just fucking nuts.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Ex-California » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:07 am

The Conservative wrote:
C-Mag wrote:These bitches are starting to get 60s crazy.
The 60's were bad, this is worse... the 60's had a reason... this is just fucking nuts.
Its a manifestation of millennial childhoods
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25281
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:10 am

Xenophon wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Xenophon wrote:
So he's a moron because he was not bending knee to the violent anarchists? Yes, if only he had cowered in his bathroom. Do not disparage him because he had the brass to actually go out in support of his beliefs and adhere to non-violence, which you give lip-service to.
Yes, he was. If you see a violent riot taking place, you do not put on the other side's colors and walk toward it, unless you're heading an army. That's just idiotic. Maybe you can paint him as some kind of idealistic martyr for the cause (that doesn't exist), but that's the best case.
Xenophon wrote:Cowardly? How many people have to be murdered in the street by ONE SIDE before you'll get it through your head that sometimes it's OK to defend oneself when faced with actual violence? Cowardice is sitting down and doing nothing.
You're not talking about defense though, are you? You and the other knucklebrains here are discussing some sort of ideological 'cleansing' of the so-called "other side". How do you think that works out? We've only done it about 1,000 times through history, yet it keeps happening - and being supported on a history forum! I'm absolutely amazed right now..
All I've said that would resemble an ideological cleansing is that the authorities need to crack down on anarchist rioters. If you have a problem with that, you and your 6'2, well-built frame can go pound sand. Defense isn't always "wait until they punch you in the face or hit you with a pipe". I'm sure you don't understand that, given your only combat experience comes from hip-tossing teenagers in your karate class, or whatever martial art it is you threatened Smitty with on the DCF.
I agree that the MAGA moron had every right to defend himself. But that's not what you're discussing. You're talking about why a mob of military police didn't descend on the scene and stop it. I'm saying it was a wise move.

I also agree that rioters need to be stopped. However, they didn't reach an unacceptable level of violence, IMO - with a single exception. This was not a city-wide mob scene, this was a few dozen people acting like animals for a few hours. It could have been much, much worse.

And yes, you guys are constantly using masturbating over the idea of lamppost hangings and firing squads to 'destroy the cancer' of people that think differently than you. Your bullshit is being heard by millions of people, and will create more reactions like this. It's inevitable.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14794
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by The Conservative » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:12 am

California wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
C-Mag wrote:These bitches are starting to get 60s crazy.
The 60's were bad, this is worse... the 60's had a reason... this is just fucking nuts.
Its a manifestation of millennial childhoods
Well, they need to be bitch slapped by some old school 70's realization...
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by C-Mag » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:12 am

California wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
C-Mag wrote:These bitches are starting to get 60s crazy.
The 60's were bad, this is worse... the 60's had a reason... this is just fucking nuts.
Its a manifestation of millennial childhoods
I tend to disagree. While millennials are in the street doing this shit, I see it being driven by washed up Boomers and some Gen Xers, who are inciting this behavior. You have the media who has been on a jihad against Trump for coming on 2 years telling everyone how bad he is, with little to know actual events to point to. You have Barry 44 doubling down on this. You have untold numbers of college profs reliving there 60s protesting yutes and it's all influencing and mobilizing a very small minority of the millennials.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Xenophon » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:15 am

double post
Last edited by Xenophon on Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Dangerous Faggots Starting Civil War

Post by Xenophon » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:18 am

Xenophon wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
All I've said that would resemble an ideological cleansing is that the authorities need to crack down on anarchist rioters. If you have a problem with that, you and your 6'2, well-built frame can go pound sand. Defense isn't always "wait until they punch you in the face or hit you with a pipe". I'm sure you don't understand that, given your only combat experience comes from hip-tossing teenagers in your karate class, or whatever martial art it is you threatened Smitty with on the DCF.
I agree that the MAGA moron had every right to defend himself. But that's not what you're discussing. You're talking about why a mob of military police didn't descend on the scene and stop it. I'm saying it was a wise move.

I also agree that rioters need to be stopped. However, they didn't reach an unacceptable level of violence, IMO - with a single exception. This was not a city-wide mob scene, this was a few dozen people acting like animals for a few hours. It could have been much, much worse.

And yes, you guys are constantly using masturbating over the idea of lamppost hangings and firing squads to 'destroy the cancer' of people that think differently than you. Your bullshit is being heard by millions of people, and will create more reactions like this. It's inevitable.
No. I advocated an appropriate response to dangerous rioters destroying property and fighting people in the street. I said nothing about military police. They would only be called in to police a civilian population under martial law (in the US).

It could have been worse. Everything can be worse. "Oh, I just got robbed, but at least he didn't chain me to the back of his Trans-Am and drag me down a dirt road."

I have not once said to hang these people. I have never said that they need to be shot via firing squad. Do not project others views upon me. You're engaging with me now, Grumps. Don't get sidetracked.