Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Oh, make no mistake, the presumption remains, de facto if not de jure, in the majority of courts for mother to become the primary residential parent. It's rebuttable, but you best understand that it is there. It's almost impossible to present as an issue on appeal, also. There are just too many moving parts. Trial judges are powerful as shit in their fiefdoms, belee dat.
Now, one area where the vagaries of divorce law WON'T be coming up is in the SCOTUS. /waiting for the nomination.
Now, one area where the vagaries of divorce law WON'T be coming up is in the SCOTUS. /waiting for the nomination.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
The day we abolish child support and alimony, all this shit goes away.
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:56 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Get snipped and only fuck robots and prostitutes.
It's not what Jesus would do, but Jesus didn't live under the US family court system.
It's not what Jesus would do, but Jesus didn't live under the US family court system.
Still got my foreskin thanks for asking. - Montegriffo.
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
This needs to go on the Liberalist Facebook pageboethius wrote:Get snipped and only fuck robots and prostitutes.
It's not what Jesus would do, but Jesus didn't live under the US family court system.
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3169 ... rt-nominee
Some Dems have already vowed to filibuster Trump pick, even though the pick has not even been announced yet. Thanks for not even trying to pretend this is about the qualifications of the pick. It's about being butthurt that the GOP didn't vote in Obama's choice last year.
Of course now Schumer regrets the Dems enabling the nuclear option back in 2013 when they changed the rules to fit their agenda. Funny how you regret using a weapon once it's being pointed back at you.
Some Dems have already vowed to filibuster Trump pick, even though the pick has not even been announced yet. Thanks for not even trying to pretend this is about the qualifications of the pick. It's about being butthurt that the GOP didn't vote in Obama's choice last year.
Of course now Schumer regrets the Dems enabling the nuclear option back in 2013 when they changed the rules to fit their agenda. Funny how you regret using a weapon once it's being pointed back at you.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
This has been happening over and over, from both sides, for many decades. They just don't learn. None of them. Believe me that they'll be passing legislation that will suck for them big time when a D gets in next.PartyOf5 wrote:
Of course now Schumer regrets the Dems enabling the nuclear option back in 2013 when they changed the rules to fit their agenda. Funny how you regret using a weapon once it's being pointed back at you.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Nothing like this happened in our lifetimes. Trump is about to set the Supreme Court for generations. This one opening is just the beginning. Besides this one appointment, three other judges will soon be in their eighties, and that includes Ginsberg and Kennedy..
Run, degenerates, run!
Run, degenerates, run!
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Well, he's building the drama.
I really, really hope he gets this right. Whoever it is, they will obviously be miles ahead of whatever we would have gotten if the election had gone the other way. It's hard to guess what kind of judge Billary would have appointed, given that she would have held no cards in the Senate. I just hope DJT meant what he said about a Fat Tony lookalike.
First on CNN: Trump bringing Supreme Court favorites to Washington
I really, really hope he gets this right. Whoever it is, they will obviously be miles ahead of whatever we would have gotten if the election had gone the other way. It's hard to guess what kind of judge Billary would have appointed, given that she would have held no cards in the Senate. I just hope DJT meant what he said about a Fat Tony lookalike.
First on CNN: Trump bringing Supreme Court favorites to Washington
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
So much winning. The DNC and Chuckles are approaching the brink.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/01/poten ... l-gorsuch/
http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/01/poten ... l-gorsuch/
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario