THE ERA OF TRUMP

[C-Mag]

Telepathic power to overide all negative racial stereotyping.

That would be a great power to disarm peoples' suspicions to help airplane bombers better get through security.

No it would only be used to deprogram those brainwashed by Brietbart and return the power of critical though to them.

The family would likely use there powers to carry our Sharia Justice on the people of the Great Satan. Perhaps the wife would have the power to circumcise the sluts of America.

[Okeefenokee]

Well quelle fuckin' surprise, the fans are all pro-cronyism now that it is a swamp-draining 'deregulation' somehow. Fascinating really.

Please do refer to and read De O's post. Congress pushing statues for arbitration, congress allowing litigation. Regulators HOOO either damn way ain't it?

But no, no. This is deregulation because the GOP likes it. On the plus side, Trump doesn't have to foot his own reelection bill now that it is totally cool to cozy up to them Wall Street dinner party luminaries... for deregulating purposes of course.

Where is clubby to call people hacks in the absolute crassest way when you need him?

It's a voluntary agreement with a credit lender. You're borrowing money on the pretense that you can't pay it back, and want unca suga to force lenders into arrangements they wouldn't otherwise enter into.

The dishonest intentions are evident from the start. If you weren't trying to scam someone for a free lunch, you wouldn't be worried about the terms of what happens when you don't hold up your end of the deal.

[Speaker to Animals]

That would be a great power to disarm peoples' suspicions to help airplane bombers better get through security.

No it would only be used to deprogram those brainwashed by Brietbart and return the power of critical though to them.

The family would likely use there powers to carry our Sharia Justice on the people of the Great Satan. Perhaps the wife would have the power to circumcise the sluts of America.

Wifey should have the power to indoctrinate maladapted western women to wear the hijab and submit to Allah.

Oh wait..

[C-Mag]

No it would only be used to deprogram those brainwashed by Brietbart and return the power of critical though to them.

The family would likely use there powers to carry our Sharia Justice on the people of the Great Satan. Perhaps the wife would have the power to circumcise the sluts of America.

Wifey should have the power to indoctrinate maladapted western women to wear the hijab and submit to Allah.

Oh wait..

They can run around America carrying out Honor Killings for those who insult Islam.
They gotta be based in Dearborn, Michigan

[SuburbanFarmer]

Well quelle fuckin' surprise, the fans are all pro-cronyism now that it is a swamp-draining 'deregulation' somehow. Fascinating really.

Please do refer to and read De O's post. Congress pushing statues for arbitration, congress allowing litigation. Regulators HOOO either damn way ain't it?

But no, no. This is deregulation because the GOP likes it. On the plus side, Trump doesn't have to foot his own reelection bill now that it is totally cool to cozy up to them Wall Street dinner party luminaries... for deregulating purposes of course.

Where is clubby to call people hacks in the absolute crassest way when you need him?

It's a voluntary agreement with a credit lender. You're borrowing money on the pretense that you can't pay it back, and want unca suga to force lenders into arrangements they wouldn't otherwise enter into.

The dishonest intentions are evident from the start. If you weren't trying to scam someone for a free lunch, you wouldn't be worried about the terms of what happens when you don't hold up your end of the deal.

And when your identity gets stolen, and they refuse to listen?

Or, when they slip a clause in to add 100% compound daily interest in your debt, retroactively?

I’m sure it’s fine.

[StCapps]

Monte's show idea really sucks, boring, the rest of you might be on to something.

[Okeefenokee]

Well quelle fuckin' surprise, the fans are all pro-cronyism now that it is a swamp-draining 'deregulation' somehow. Fascinating really.

Please do refer to and read De O's post. Congress pushing statues for arbitration, congress allowing litigation. Regulators HOOO either damn way ain't it?

But no, no. This is deregulation because the GOP likes it. On the plus side, Trump doesn't have to foot his own reelection bill now that it is totally cool to cozy up to them Wall Street dinner party luminaries... for deregulating purposes of course.

Where is clubby to call people hacks in the absolute crassest way when you need him?

It's a voluntary agreement with a credit lender. You're borrowing money on the pretense that you can't pay it back, and want unca suga to force lenders into arrangements they wouldn't otherwise enter into.

The dishonest intentions are evident from the start. If you weren't trying to scam someone for a free lunch, you wouldn't be worried about the terms of what happens when you don't hold up your end of the deal.

And when your identity gets stolen, and they refuse to listen?

Or, when they slip a clause in to add 100% compound daily interest in your debt, retroactively?

I’m sure it’s fine.

Tell us more spooky ghost stories that you made up in your head. I'll get the smores.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Well quelle fuckin' surprise, the fans are all pro-cronyism now that it is a swamp-draining 'deregulation' somehow. Fascinating really.

Please do refer to and read De O's post. Congress pushing statues for arbitration, congress allowing litigation. Regulators HOOO either damn way ain't it?

But no, no. This is deregulation because the GOP likes it. On the plus side, Trump doesn't have to foot his own reelection bill now that it is totally cool to cozy up to them Wall Street dinner party luminaries... for deregulating purposes of course.

Where is clubby to call people hacks in the absolute crassest way when you need him?

It's a voluntary agreement with a credit lender. You're borrowing money on the pretense that you can't pay it back, and want unca suga to force lenders into arrangements they wouldn't otherwise enter into.

The dishonest intentions are evident from the start. If you weren't trying to scam someone for a free lunch, you wouldn't be worried about the terms of what happens when you don't hold up your end of the deal.

That presumes the desire to litigate will spring from a failure or contract breach from the credit holder, rather than the credit issuer.

Congress has its sticky lil' fingers in regulating commerce either way... sort of their job. They aren't 'forcing' the issuer into extending credit anymore than they are forcing the holder to accept it by addressing the legality of particular terms of agreement.

[Speaker to Animals]

Well quelle fuckin' surprise, the fans are all pro-cronyism now that it is a swamp-draining 'deregulation' somehow. Fascinating really.

Please do refer to and read De O's post. Congress pushing statues for arbitration, congress allowing litigation. Regulators HOOO either damn way ain't it?

But no, no. This is deregulation because the GOP likes it. On the plus side, Trump doesn't have to foot his own reelection bill now that it is totally cool to cozy up to them Wall Street dinner party luminaries... for deregulating purposes of course.

Where is clubby to call people hacks in the absolute crassest way when you need him?

It's a voluntary agreement with a credit lender. You're borrowing money on the pretense that you can't pay it back, and want unca suga to force lenders into arrangements they wouldn't otherwise enter into.

The dishonest intentions are evident from the start. If you weren't trying to scam someone for a free lunch, you wouldn't be worried about the terms of what happens when you don't hold up your end of the deal.

And when your identity gets stolen, and they refuse to listen?

Or, when they slip a clause in to add 100% compound daily interest in your debt, retroactively?

I’m sure it’s fine.

Item 1 doesn't apply to you. You did not sign any contract with this company and are not required to go through their corrupt private arbitration process.

Item 2 is already illegal. They can change terms going forward but not retroactively AFAIK.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

It's a voluntary agreement with a credit lender. You're borrowing money on the pretense that you can't pay it back, and want unca suga to force lenders into arrangements they wouldn't otherwise enter into.

The dishonest intentions are evident from the start. If you weren't trying to scam someone for a free lunch, you wouldn't be worried about the terms of what happens when you don't hold up your end of the deal.

And when your identity gets stolen, and they refuse to listen?

Or, when they slip a clause in to add 100% compound daily interest in your debt, retroactively?

I’m sure it’s fine.

Item 1 doesn't apply to you. You did not sign any contract with this company and are not required to go through their corrupt private arbitration process.

Item 2 is already illegal. They can change terms going forward but not retroactively AFAIK.

But this is exactly the point. It is possible for the credit issuer to breach the contract, or otherwise break a law. As it currently stands, we haven't 'deregulated' shit. We have merely regulated that you have to seek arbitration as a credit holder.