Yeah, the money just appears at the base of the Statue of Liberty every morning.Okeefenokee wrote:No, you didn't. Paying taxes doesn't make you special. Every soldier pays taxes.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Any costs??? I FUCKING PAID FOR IT.Okeefenokee wrote:
No, it's definitely you. You're bragging about being exempt from any costs whatsoever of endless war, then you get indignant when your free-riding is pointed out.
Not to mention that taxes have nothing to do with military spending.
THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
I had no idea there were so many options. My experience just got betterFife wrote:Board Style: Black (Green)California wrote:How did you make the forum look liek that?Fife wrote:
What skin does everyone else like? (Still need a Hash logo instead of the phpBB generic).
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Trump's mistake was focusing on health care in the first place, Congress doesn't have a clue how to fix health care, he should have focused on less controversial issues. He fell into the same trap that Obama did. Focusing on immigration, tax reform or infrastructure would have been the better move, by far.ssu wrote:This was the time that actually some breakthrough legislation an "outsider" like Trump could have passed by leaning on both some Republicans and also Democrats. That could have happened. Trump could have broken party lines in things like health care, yet then gone forward with things like the wall. He would have had his supporters.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Infrastructure is what they can actually do and they should have focused on.StCapps wrote:Trump's mistake was focusing on health care in the first place, Congress doesn't have a clue how to fix health care, he should have focused on less controversial issues. He fell into the same trap that Obama did. Focusing on immigration, tax reform or infrastructure would have been the better move, by far.ssu wrote:This was the time that actually some breakthrough legislation an "outsider" like Trump could have passed by leaning on both some Republicans and also Democrats. That could have happened. Trump could have broken party lines in things like health care, yet then gone forward with things like the wall. He would have had his supporters.
Immigration is a landmine due to SIX HIRBing and virtue signaling and the tax reform they have put into place is a big fuckup because it doesn't go quite far enough.
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
*yip*California wrote:Infrastructure is what they can actually do and they should have focused on.
Still easier to make a deal on immigration or tax reform than health care, just pointing out how far down the list of priorities health care reform should have been, yet for some reason Trump choose to put it at the top of his agenda.Immigration is a landmine due to SIX HIRBing and virtue signaling and the tax reform they have put into place is a big fuckup because it doesn't go quite far enough.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Sure, I agree with you. The healthcare/health insurance thing is a gigantic disasterStCapps wrote:*yip*California wrote:Infrastructure is what they can actually do and they should have focused on.
Still easier to make a deal on immigration or tax reform than health care, just pointing out how far down the list of priorities health care reform should have been, yet for some reason Trump choose to put it at the top of his agenda.Immigration is a landmine due to SIX HIRBing and virtue signaling and the tax reform they have put into place is a big fuckup because it doesn't go quite far enough.
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Trump picked his battles poorly on that one, almost as poorly as his biggest critics choose their battles with him.California wrote:Sure, I agree with you. The healthcare/health insurance thing is a gigantic disasterStCapps wrote:*yip*California wrote:Infrastructure is what they can actually do and they should have focused on.
Still easier to make a deal on immigration or tax reform than health care, just pointing out how far down the list of priorities health care reform should have been, yet for some reason Trump choose to put it at the top of his agenda.Immigration is a landmine due to SIX HIRBing and virtue signaling and the tax reform they have put into place is a big fuckup because it doesn't go quite far enough.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
#fixyourmuslimproblemyoufaggotwithacidinyourface
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... e-confirmsIn June it emerged that Trump told May he did not want to go ahead with a state visit until the British public supported him coming.
In July the Guardian reported that the UK government had conceded that the visit would not take place until 2018, amid claims that Trump had been “scared off” by the threat of protests.
The Stop Trump Coalition and other campaigns have vowed a massive show of force on the streets. Sadiq Khan, the London mayor, called for the visit to be cancelled after Trump criticised his response to the London Bridge terrorist attack.
The president provoked a further backlash on Friday when he tweeted: “Just out report: ‘United Kingdom crime rises 13% annually amid spread of Radical Islamic terror.’ Not good, we must keep America safe!”
British police recorded 5.2m offences in the last year, only a fraction of which were associated with terrorism. Former Labour leader Ed Miliband called Trump “a moron” while Conservative backbencher Nicholas Soames described him as a “daft twerp” who needed to “fix gun control”.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.