Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
This is how they fail:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/0 ... e-a-fraud/
I suspect this charade will blow up the Dems come election day. It looks like a train wreck in progress, in slow motion. There's still time to throw the popcorn in the microwave.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/0 ... e-a-fraud/
I suspect this charade will blow up the Dems come election day. It looks like a train wreck in progress, in slow motion. There's still time to throw the popcorn in the microwave.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
From the sidebar in that link:
:goteam: :drunk:
:goteam: :drunk:
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Kerning gonna get you, DiFi.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:27 amThis is how they fail:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/0 ... e-a-fraud/
I suspect this charade will blow up the Dems come election day. It looks like a train wreck in progress, in slow motion. There's still time to throw the popcorn in the microwave.
I printed this and its been sitting on one of my bookshelves since 2004, no joke.
Last edited by Fife on Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
At what point do most people realize these are garbage human beings? Fucking stop elevating these people.Fife wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:34 amSpeaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:27 amThis is how they fail:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/0 ... e-a-fraud/
I suspect this charade will blow up the Dems come election day. It looks like a train wreck in progress, in slow motion. There's still time to throw the popcorn in the microwave.
I printed this and its been sitting on one of my bookshelves since 2004, no joke.
Do you have any idea what would happen to the average airman in 1973 if he sent that to his squadron commander?
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Well, it's a fake. There's no high ground between Rather and W. That's the point. :/
Last edited by Fife on Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
A doctorate in sociology, who has read “hundreds” of letters?Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:27 amThis is how they fail:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/0 ... e-a-fraud/
I suspect this charade will blow up the Dems come election day. It looks like a train wreck in progress, in slow motion. There's still time to throw the popcorn in the microwave.
Wow.
Dumb.
The point that the letter does not seem to reflect a PhD education is well made - but the rest of that was extremely dumb.
Owwww.
Last edited by DBTrek on Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Again, that's why the joke is on Rather.
And in 2018, DiFi.
The joke doesn't rehabilitate GWB; or Georgetown Preppies. It does make me smile over here in my insular Tahiti, tho.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I think it said PhD in English (creative writing).DBTrek wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:40 amA doctorate in sociology, who has read “hundreds” of letters?Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 7:27 amThis is how they fail:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/0 ... e-a-fraud/
I suspect this charade will blow up the Dems come election day. It looks like a train wreck in progress, in slow motion. There's still time to throw the popcorn in the microwave.
Wow.
Dumb.
The point that the letter does not seem to reflect a PhD education is well made - but the rest of that was extremely dumb.
Owwww.
I don't really care about her credentials. The argument she made is a good one. That truly does not read like something an actual researcher would write.
Well, maybe a biologist or something like that. Those people are fucking ridiculous. But this woman supposedly is good at mathematics, so she's not a joke like most natural science folks.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I really need to see that it's the same woman. I want to see this professor come out and publicly make her case. I realize universities have fallen down a steep decline towards the coming dark age, and California is piloting this bobsled of doom down the luge, but I have trouble believing that letter was written by the woman to which the media attributes it.