See Monte? We used these things 70 years ago TO SAVE THE WORLD. Now shut your whore mouth about the soldiers.Okeefenokee wrote:and much more.GrumpyCatFace wrote:We’re not allowed to discuss this, as we lack a military record.
[s]YouTube stuff[/s] cancelled
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: YouTube stuff
-
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:29 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
What kind of asshole would bother to take a video of Bigfoot? Shoot the fucking thing, skin it, GPS mark the site, and head home with the pelt. That would be irrefutable evidence. Get a hair sample and send it for DNA testing with a trusted (but strategically ignorant) friend's email account as a return address. Roll the pelt up tight in a heavy-duty glad bag and freeze it. Bury whatever remains of the remains where you left them. After your friend calls you--probably while washing down donuts with coffee at the local FBI--pull up stakes with your frozen parcel, then call an attorney from your comfy hotel. Feel free to hit the mini bar.Speaker to Animals wrote:Seriously, how much do you think you could make off a clear video of one? How does that even work? Do you license the video or something?
But until such developments, turn that stupid fucking podcast off.
"She had yellow hair and she walked funny and she made a noise like... O my God, please don't kill me! "
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
Alexander PhiAlipson wrote:What kind of asshole would bother to take a video of Bigfoot? Shoot the fucking thing, skin it, GPS mark the site, and head home with the pelt. That would be irrefutable evidence. Get a hair sample and send it for DNA testing with a trusted (but strategically ignorant) friend's email account as a return address. Roll the pelt up tight in a heavy-duty glad bag and freeze it. Bury whatever remains of the remains where you left them. After your friend calls you--probably while washing down donuts with coffee at the local FBI--pull up stakes with your frozen parcel, then call an attorney from your comfy hotel. Feel free to hit the mini bar.Speaker to Animals wrote:Seriously, how much do you think you could make off a clear video of one? How does that even work? Do you license the video or something?
But until such developments, turn that stupid fucking podcast off.
Which podcast is that? There are several now.
And didn't you hear that old boy down in Cleveland County? He said the squatch was too much like a human, with beautiful hair. Who wants to spend the rest of their lives wondering if they murdered somebody?
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
Well if that's the rules then I have to say I'm rather concerned about how many people considered themselves qualified to comment in the Kevin Rapey thread.GrumpyCatFace wrote:We’re not allowed to discuss this, as we lack a military record. But rest assured, our MIC victims have reviewed the situation carefully, and have decided that we must pay for carriers.Montegriffo wrote:Did we ever finish this conversation?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
More people need to start talking about the insanity of carrier groups. You don't have to be a rear admiral to see the problem.
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: YouTube stuff
I tried, and you were one of the MIC Defenders shouting me down.Speaker to Animals wrote:More people need to start talking about the insanity of carrier groups. You don't have to be a rear admiral to see the problem.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
To be fair, StA has been consistent in his opposition to blowing the budget on carriers.GrumpyCatFace wrote:I tried, and you were one of the MIC Defenders shouting me down.Speaker to Animals wrote:More people need to start talking about the insanity of carrier groups. You don't have to be a rear admiral to see the problem.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
GrumpyCatFace wrote:I tried, and you were one of the MIC Defenders shouting me down.Speaker to Animals wrote:More people need to start talking about the insanity of carrier groups. You don't have to be a rear admiral to see the problem.
LOL, no. I have been arguing against carrier groups for years on this forum. You are just a massive faggot.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: YouTube stuff
You've also been pretty vocal about name calling too. Maybe you only meant DB calling you names.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:I tried, and you were one of the MIC Defenders shouting me down.Speaker to Animals wrote:More people need to start talking about the insanity of carrier groups. You don't have to be a rear admiral to see the problem.
LOL, no. I have been arguing against carrier groups for years on this forum. You are just a massive faggot.
Hoist that double standard.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: YouTube stuff
Montegriffo wrote:You've also been pretty vocal about name calling too. Maybe you only meant DB calling you names.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
I tried, and you were one of the MIC Defenders shouting me down.
LOL, no. I have been arguing against carrier groups for years on this forum. You are just a massive faggot.
Hoist that double standard.
LMFAO
Then what have you been doing, little miss innocence?