They don't?Speaker to Animals wrote:I doubt the Afghan people have a huge chub for liberty...
DrYouth wrote:They don't?Speaker to Animals wrote:I doubt the Afghan people have a huge chub for liberty...
How do you figure?
Aren't their militias all fighting for their own versions of freedom...
Freedom to do what they want...
Treat their women how they want...
Grow the cash crops they want...
Freedom to resist the state.
Again, the drug testing program did not lower benefit costs. We spent more than ever in the wake of it. I was there at the time.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:The result was that the drug testing cost billions of extra dollars, the medical supplier made out like a bandit, and no cases were ever found. Benefits were unaffected.Speaker to Animals wrote:It's like that Florida policy Kath was bitching about earlier. It was actually genius. Require drug screening to receive state welfare. The result? A huge percentage of these people didn't even bother because gibs were less important than getting fucked up, and they obviously had enough money for drugs, so it's not like they can argue the state should subsidize drug abuse.
Any idiot can clean up for 24 hours, or beat a drug test, for free money. Why is it that the Right always assumes that people are no smarter than livestock?
An increase in upfront costs is better than the long term costs of an increasing welfare state.
If we cut single mothers off, for instance, in the 1980s, it would suck for maybe 10% of women. Do it now, and you are talking about more than half your generation's females living off the backs of men. Would it be more expensive to simply provide day care and direct services to children without a dime going to the hands of women? Probably. Long term, though? Not a chance. What you subsidize you get more of. Had we not directly rewarded women, we wouldn't be in this situation now.
The result of that program was a huge percentage of applicants just walking away when they got a notice to report for a drug test. That's a win.
So why all these brown people flocking to the US...Speaker to Animals wrote:The only people who ever gave a shit about liberty were white people, and even then we are talking mainly about Anglos, and of them now only a small percentage..
The stories that came out in when they tried it put a significant percentage of applicants giving up upon being informed of the drug test, dude. It was a success. Liberals are trying to muddy the waters with all this other garbage.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Again, the drug testing program did not lower benefit costs. We spent more than ever in the wake of it. I was there at the time.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The result was that the drug testing cost billions of extra dollars, the medical supplier made out like a bandit, and no cases were ever found. Benefits were unaffected.
Any idiot can clean up for 24 hours, or beat a drug test, for free money. Why is it that the Right always assumes that people are no smarter than livestock?
An increase in upfront costs is better than the long term costs of an increasing welfare state.
If we cut single mothers off, for instance, in the 1980s, it would suck for maybe 10% of women. Do it now, and you are talking about more than half your generation's females living off the backs of men. Would it be more expensive to simply provide day care and direct services to children without a dime going to the hands of women? Probably. Long term, though? Not a chance. What you subsidize you get more of. Had we not directly rewarded women, we wouldn't be in this situation now.
The result of that program was a huge percentage of applicants just walking away when they got a notice to report for a drug test. That's a win.
Also, the program only lasted for 4 months.
DrYouth wrote:So why all these brown people flocking to the US...Speaker to Animals wrote:The only people who ever gave a shit about liberty were white people, and even then we are talking mainly about Anglos, and of them now only a small percentage..
Cause they hate liberty?
They seem to be eating it up for the most part.
Why not just stay in their militia ridden shit holes... with no interfering state.
Yes, the stories did say that. The stories also held Kansas as a model of economic success, after Brownback tried to eliminate taxation for business growth.Speaker to Animals wrote:The stories that came out in when they tried it put a significant percentage of applicants giving up upon being informed of the drug test, dude. It was a success. Liberals are trying to muddy the waters with all this other garbage.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Again, the drug testing program did not lower benefit costs. We spent more than ever in the wake of it. I was there at the time.Speaker to Animals wrote:
An increase in upfront costs is better than the long term costs of an increasing welfare state.
If we cut single mothers off, for instance, in the 1980s, it would suck for maybe 10% of women. Do it now, and you are talking about more than half your generation's females living off the backs of men. Would it be more expensive to simply provide day care and direct services to children without a dime going to the hands of women? Probably. Long term, though? Not a chance. What you subsidize you get more of. Had we not directly rewarded women, we wouldn't be in this situation now.
The result of that program was a huge percentage of applicants just walking away when they got a notice to report for a drug test. That's a win.
Also, the program only lasted for 4 months.
They aren't. And all 1.5 million new Islamic Germans are not forming rape gangs.Speaker to Animals wrote:DrYouth wrote:So why all these brown people flocking to the US...Speaker to Animals wrote:The only people who ever gave a shit about liberty were white people, and even then we are talking mainly about Anglos, and of them now only a small percentage..
Cause they hate liberty?
They seem to be eating it up for the most part.
Why not just stay in their militia ridden shit holes... with no interfering state.
Why are all the brown people demanding we give up our liberties once they get here? They don't give a shit about liberty. They wanted the fruits of liberty (economic prosperity) without understanding where and why those things came about.
Absolution Style by Premium phpBB Styles
