Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by The Conservative » Wed Nov 20, 2019 4:47 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 4:28 pm
Did you watch it?
I watched the entire thing live. I am asking your opinion, because you are seeing something I don't.

Because the entire conversation was based on hearsay.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:31 pm

Yeah keep pushing the hearsay narrative, that's sure to work out.
Trump could always release all the actual witnesses to testify under oath and even stand himself if he wants to prove it's nothing but hearsay.
Perjury ain't no big thang...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by The Conservative » Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:51 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:31 pm
Yeah keep pushing the hearsay narrative, that's sure to work out.
Trump could always release all the actual witnesses to testify under oath and even stand himself if he wants to prove it's nothing but hearsay.
Perjury ain't no big thang...
Except for the guy today, which had to go by what other people wrote down to back his own story...

Every single person that has been a witness has either nothing except word of mouth, or their opinion. Which is gossip, and under any court of law, especially an idea that has no foundation in law, is insubmissable?

We have nothing to go on but hearsay until today.

And the witness today was fucking useless. He couldn't remember anything and wouldn't even take the bait Schiff was putting down in front of him.

This entire thing is a clown show that only you'd be willing to amuse.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:11 pm

I WANT NOTHING
Yeah right Donnie, shouting doesn't make you more believable. Quite the opposite in fact.
Makes you look desperate actually.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by The Conservative » Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:17 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:11 pm
I WANT NOTHING
Yeah right Donnie, shouting doesn't make you more believable. Quite the opposite in fact.
Makes you look desperate actually.
Multiple people heard him say it, and it's in writing.

Can't dispute facts.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:25 pm

The Conservative wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:17 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:11 pm
I WANT NOTHING
Yeah right Donnie, shouting doesn't make you more believable. Quite the opposite in fact.
Makes you look desperate actually.
Multiple people heard him say it, and it's in writing.

Can't dispute facts.
Sounds like the phone calls then.
Lots of people heard them and the transcripts are written down but somehow that's hearsay and Trump's latest fantasy is indisputable facts.

Go home clown show and never call anyone a hack ever again.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

brewster
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by brewster » Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:31 pm

I'm curious. Just for argument's sake lets assume it went down exactly like these witnesses are saying. Lets momentarily step past the "hearsay!!" "witchhunt!!" and character assassinations. Do you care or do you think it's no big deal? That 'it all in the game' as Mulvaney has implied?
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by The Conservative » Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:02 pm

brewster wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:31 pm
I'm curious. Just for argument's sake lets assume it went down exactly like these witnesses are saying. Lets momentarily step past the "hearsay!!" "witchhunt!!" and character assassinations. Do you care or do you think it's no big deal? That 'it all in the game' as Mulvaney has implied?
If it went exactly as stated, and there was no hearsay, but there was true proof... I'd be demanding his resignation... but the problem is that "quid pro quo" is an everyday thing with governments. It's called negotiations, tit for tat, quid pro quo... you can name it any way you want, but an agreement between countries is always a give and take.

Give money, expect something in return. Give soldiers, expect something in return.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by pineapplemike » Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:04 pm

what is foreign aid except for a quid pro quo? just the US government feeling generous?

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

Post by Smitty-48 » Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:06 pm

pineapplemike wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 7:04 pm
what is foreign aid except for a quid pro quo? just the US government feeling generous?
Flood the world with US dollars, it's world domination, nary a shot fired.

Information War.
Nec Aspera Terrent