Woah, hold on a minute. You defended her love of Pinochet due to his help sharing intel during the Falklands conflict. I made a case for her being responsible for propping him up and selling water cannons to him and you shot me down.Smitty-48 wrote:Should have just thrown Pinochet to the wolves as well, another American proxy which Britain had no reason to come to the defence of.Montegriffo wrote:There, doesn't that feel better?
I'll go next, she was brilliant in the house of commons. Even after I'd become disillusioned with her I still enjoyed listening to her put the old Welsh windbag in his place. Best put downs since Sir Winston.
This is like the truth and reconciliation commission. Got any more?
PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
You certainly do exploit all avenues of approach, with HM forces in harms way during hostilities, we worked with Joe Stalin too, but that's no cause to maintain the relationship in perpetuity, allies of convenience are no real allies at all, soon as said proxy is of no further use and rather becomes a burden, pitch them under the bus with alacrity, no need to get mushy about things, there are no friends, only interests.Montegriffo wrote:Woah, hold on a minute. You defended her love of Pinochet due to his help sharing intel during the Falklands conflict. I made a case for her being responsible for propping him up and selling water cannons to him and you shot me down.Smitty-48 wrote:Should have just thrown Pinochet to the wolves as well, another American proxy which Britain had no reason to come to the defence of.Montegriffo wrote:There, doesn't that feel better?
I'll go next, she was brilliant in the house of commons. Even after I'd become disillusioned with her I still enjoyed listening to her put the old Welsh windbag in his place. Best put downs since Sir Winston.
This is like the truth and reconciliation commission. Got any more?
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
So keep him on the Christmas card list if you must Maggie but water cannons to prop up his fascist regime is a no no?Smitty-48 wrote:You certainly do exploit all avenues of approach, with HM forces in harms way during hostilities, we worked with Joe Stalin too, but that's no cause to maintain the relationship in perpetuity, allies of convenience are no real allies at all, soon as said proxy is of no further use and rather becomes a burden, pitch them under the bus with alacrity, no need to get mushy about things, there are no friends, only interests.Montegriffo wrote:Woah, hold on a minute. You defended her love of Pinochet due to his help sharing intel during the Falklands conflict. I made a case for her being responsible for propping him up and selling water cannons to him and you shot me down.Smitty-48 wrote:
Should have just thrown Pinochet to the wolves as well, another American proxy which Britain had no reason to come to the defence of.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
No Christmas cards, water cannons for sale open for business, of course, liberal press whines about it; a private concern selling fire hoses, no crime is that.Montegriffo wrote:So keep him on the Christmas card list if you must Maggie but water cannons to prop up his fascist regime is a no no?Smitty-48 wrote:You certainly do exploit all avenues of approach, with HM forces in harms way during hostilities, we worked with Joe Stalin too, but that's no cause to maintain the relationship in perpetuity, allies of convenience are no real allies at all, soon as said proxy is of no further use and rather becomes a burden, pitch them under the bus with alacrity, no need to get mushy about things, there are no friends, only interests.Montegriffo wrote:
Woah, hold on a minute. You defended her love of Pinochet due to his help sharing intel during the Falklands conflict. I made a case for her being responsible for propping him up and selling water cannons to him and you shot me down.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
Yeah them fucking Liberals disapproving of propping up fascist dictators. Fetch the rope eh wot?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
Whose propping anything up? It's a fire hose, for private sale by a private concern, what's the charge, officer? Legally selling products and services on the open market to non-scheduled countries? No crime is that. No crime, no business of the Crown, free country.Montegriffo wrote:Yeah them fucking Liberals disapproving of propping up fascist dictators. Fetch the rope eh wot?
What do you want? You want to overthrow the Crown for some sort of Leftist dictatorship legislating from the streets like a pack of filthy Bolsheviks? Sod the rope, fetch the grapeshot, wot?
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
Fire hose my arse. It was water cannon mounted on riot control trucks which were electrified to 8000 volts if my memory serves me right. No civilian use, in direct contravention of an international arms embargo.
Bet you'd disapprove if it had been a communist dictator.......
Bet you'd disapprove if it had been a communist dictator.......
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
Is Chile signatory to the Warsaw Pact? No? Very well then, go ahead and sell them weapons, it's a non-scheduled country, let us know when they are falling under the control of the Soviet Union, otherwise, bugger off, as there's no international statute which binds the hands of a United Nations Security Council Veto in any case.Montegriffo wrote:Fire hose my arse. It was water cannon mounted on riot control trucks which were electrified to 8000 volts if my memory serves me right. No civilian use, in direct contravention of an international arms embargo.
Bet you'd disapprove if it had been a communist dictator.......
Are they an enemy of the Crown? No? Are they taking any hostile action against the Crown? No? Are they paying in Sterling, US Dollars, or gold? Yes? Very good then, cha-ching.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
Wait... red pill me on electrified water cannons. This sounds cool
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: PARCEL #102 LONDON TUBING EDITION
Coming Soon to a Riot Near You: Crowd Control Vehicles With Electrified Hose Water
https://uk.pinterest.com/pin/194569646383019356/
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.