Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Post by Smitty-48 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:01 am

TheReal_ND wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:56 am
It was a turk. Boo
No Go Pro Livestream?

What a fuckin' loser.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:02 am

So diverse and vibrant.

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Post by Smitty-48 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:04 am

I refuse to indulge any attacks which do not come Go Pro Livestreamed.

A new bar has been set.

Bootleg. Get dat blang.
Nec Aspera Terrent

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Post by Smitty-48 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:07 am

The liberals care more about censoring than they do the attacks themselves.

No livestream, no effects.

Go Pro, or just piss off.
Nec Aspera Terrent

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Post by Ph64 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:09 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:00 am
One far-right terrorist organisation (responsible for the Jo Cox murder) was banned and its members arrested. This certainly prevented further attacks.
So which do you think prevented further attacks:
1) "banning" the group
2) arresting its members
???

Now here's a question, how many people weren't "members" but share similar views that now have been driven underground so the "security forces" no longer have a group of people to keep an eye on?

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Post by Smitty-48 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:11 am

Moreover, he has no manifesto.

I want long and detailed manifestos to go with the livestreams.

Sort it, Spergs.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Post by TheReal_ND » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:14 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:01 am
TheReal_ND wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:56 am
It was a turk. Boo
No Go Pro Livestream?

What a fuckin' loser.
Garbage. Get em out of here. Take his coat!

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Post by Smitty-48 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:18 am

TheReal_ND wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:14 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:01 am
TheReal_ND wrote:
Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:56 am
It was a turk. Boo
No Go Pro Livestream?

What a fuckin' loser.
Garbage. Get em out of here. Take his coat!
Only three people killed?

That's not a mass shooting.

This guy is an embarrassment to terrorism.
Nec Aspera Terrent

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Post by Smitty-48 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:19 am

Couldn't even afford his own assault car.

Had to take the bus to his own terror attack.

What a fuckin' loser.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Utrecht shooting: 'At least one dead' after 'potential terror attack' on tram

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:20 am

People are saying he shouted subscribe to Buzzfeed before he started shooting.