What Now, Jewspiracy Theorists?
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: What Now, Jewspiracy Theorists?
It plays into a Jewish stereotype about jew sheckles or jew gold, she might as well have said something about bloody matzohs. Had she just said AIPAC should would've been fine, but jew money. Forget it, skull drag her ass too. Rule number 4. The fact Nuke is the only backing you should concern you.DBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 5:02 pmThe part that confounds me is - Blaming big money for influencing politics is Democrat's bread and butter. It's a primary pillar of their platform.
Democrats: "Oh poor us, poor, us, we never get the shit we deserve because the mega corps, billionaires, and special interests are always fucking over the little people!"
Rep Omar: "Yeah, like AIPAC"
Democrats: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!"
What the fuck just happened? The lady is just saying the same shit you guys say 24/7, 364. So she mentioned someone besdes the NRA and the Koch brothers - so what?
I really don't get that party.
I like Israel better than any other country I can name in the ME, and I'm not mad about this shit at all.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: What Now, Jewspiracy Theorists?
Hey, I'm not trying to open the gates to some Mel Gibson type shit here. I'm just trying to figure out why saying AIPAC donates to politicians to influence policy is racist, but saying any other special interest do the same is not. The NAACP and the AARP donate to politicians to influence policy. Is saying that racist/ageist?clubgop wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:01 pm
It plays into a Jewish stereotype about jew sheckles or jew gold, she might as well have said something about bloody matzohs. Had she just said AIPAC should would've been fine, but jew money. Forget it, skull drag her ass too. Rule number 4. The fact Nuke is the only backing you should concern you.
Look, if you were to banish my ass to the ME and allow me to choose the country I went to, it would be Israel, hands down. I'm not anti-Jew or anti-Israel. I'm just trying to understand why saying politicians are in AIPAC's pocket is suddenly anti-semitic?
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: What Now, Jewspiracy Theorists?
Criticising jews is anti-Semitic
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: What Now, Jewspiracy Theorists?
I thought Anne Frank’s diary ended in the attic...?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: What Now, Jewspiracy Theorists?
On 3 September 1944,[a] the group was deported on what would be the last transport from Westerbork to the Auschwitz concentration camp and arrived after a three-day journey. On the same train was Bloeme Evers-Emden, an Amsterdam native who had befriended Margot and Anne in the Jewish Lyceum in 1941.[48] Bloeme saw Anne, Margot, and their mother regularly in Auschwitz,[49] and was interviewed for her remembrances of the Frank women in Auschwitz in the television documentary The Last Seven Months of Anne Frank (1988) by Dutch filmmaker Willy Lindwer[50] and the BBC documentary Anne Frank Remembered (1995).[51]
Upon arrival at Auschwitz, the SS forcibly separated the men from the women and children, and Otto Frank was wrenched from his family. Those deemed able to work were admitted into the camp, and those deemed unfit for labour were immediately killed. Of the 1,019 passengers, 549—including all children younger than 15—were sent directly to the gas chambers. Anne Frank, who had turned 15 three months earlier, was one of the youngest people spared from her transport. She was soon made aware that most people were gassed upon arrival and never learned that the entire group from the Achterhuis had survived this selection. She reasoned that her father, in his mid-fifties and not particularly robust, had been killed immediately after they were separated.[52]
With the other women and girls not selected for immediate death, Frank was forced to strip naked to be disinfected, had her head shaved, and was tattooed with an identifying number on her arm. By day, the women were used as slave labour and Frank was forced to haul rocks and dig rolls of sod; by night, they were crammed into overcrowded barracks. Some witnesses later testified Frank became withdrawn and tearful when she saw children being led to the gas chambers; others reported that more often she displayed strength and courage. Her gregarious and confident nature allowed her to obtain extra bread rations for her mother, sister, and herself. Disease was rampant; before long, Frank's skin became badly infected by scabies. The Frank sisters were moved into an infirmary, which was in a state of constant darkness and infested with rats and mice. Edith Frank stopped eating, saving every morsel of food for her daughters and passing her rations to them through a hole she made at the bottom of the infirmary wall.[53]
In October 1944, the Frank women were scheduled to join a transport to the Liebau labour camp in Upper Silesia. Bloeme Evers-Emden was scheduled to be on this transport, but Anne was prohibited from going because she had developed scabies, and her mother and sister opted to stay with her. Bloeme went on without them.[51]
On 28 October, selections began for women to be relocated to Bergen-Belsen. More than 8,000 women, including Anne and Margot Frank, and Auguste van Pels, were transported. Edith Frank was left behind and died from starvation.[54] Tents were erected at Bergen-Belsen to accommodate the influx of prisoners, and as the population rose, the death toll due to disease increased rapidly. Frank was briefly reunited with two friends, Hanneli Goslar and Nanette Blitz, who were confined in another section of the camp. Goslar and Blitz survived the war, and discussed the brief conversations they had conducted with Frank through a fence. Blitz described Anne as bald, emaciated, and shivering. Goslar noted Auguste van Pels was with Anne and Margot Frank, and was caring for Margot, who was severely ill. Neither of them saw Margot, as she was too weak to leave her bunk. Anne told Blitz and Goslar she believed her parents were dead, and for that reason she did not wish to live any longer. Goslar later estimated their meetings had taken place in late January or early February 1945.[55]
In early 1945, a typhus epidemic spread through the camp, killing 17,000 prisoners.[56] Other diseases, including typhoid fever, were rampant.[57] Due to these chaotic conditions, it is not possible to determine the specific cause of Anne's death. However, there is evidence that she died from the epidemic. Gena Turgel, a survivor of Bergen Belsen, later claimed to have known Anne Frank at the camp. In 2015, Turgel told the British newspaper, the Sun: “Her bed was around the corner from me. She was delirious, terrible, burning up,” adding that she had brought Frank water to wash.[58] Turgel, who worked in the camp hospital, said that the typhus epidemic at the camp took a terrible toll on the inmates. “The people were dying like flies — in the hundreds.” “Reports used to come in — 500 people who died. Three hundred? We said, ‘Thank God, only 300.’”[58]
Witnesses later testified Margot fell from her bunk in her weakened state and was killed by the shock. Anne died a few days after Margot. The exact dates of Margot's and Anne's deaths were not recorded. It was long thought that their deaths occurred only a few weeks before British soldiers liberated the camp on 15 April 1945,[59] but research in 2015 indicated that they may have died as early as February.[60] Among other evidence, witnesses recalled that the Franks displayed typhus symptoms by 7 February,[3][61] and Dutch health authorities reported that most untreated typhus victims died within 12 days of their first symptoms.[60] After liberation, the camp was burned in an effort to prevent further spread of disease; the sisters were buried in a mass grave at an unknown location.
If I were a Jew, I'd be the most militant mofo in the settlement.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: What Now, Jewspiracy Theorists?
Remember the six million! All eleven million!
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: What Now, Jewspiracy Theorists?
because the numbers dont bare it out. Arab regimes funnel more money to politicians and newsgroups, (TYT) that dwarf what AIPAC. Even the NRADBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:07 pmHey, I'm not trying to open the gates to some Mel Gibson type shit here. I'm just trying to figure out why saying AIPAC donates to politicians to influence policy is racist, but saying any other special interest do the same is not. The NAACP and the AARP donate to politicians to influence policy. Is saying that racist/ageist?clubgop wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:01 pm
It plays into a Jewish stereotype about jew sheckles or jew gold, she might as well have said something about bloody matzohs. Had she just said AIPAC should would've been fine, but jew money. Forget it, skull drag her ass too. Rule number 4. The fact Nuke is the only backing you should concern you.
Look, if you were to banish my ass to the ME and allow me to choose the country I went to, it would be Israel, hands down. I'm not anti-Jew or anti-Israel. I'm just trying to understand why saying politicians are in AIPAC's pocket is suddenly anti-semitic?
It's not so much what she said it's how she said it. If someone said "the only reason Democrats support blacks is cause all the coon money from the NAACP." Best believe there would be hell to pay. The left is getting banged on for their antisemitism. Notice how punky and dirty dick ISIS is absent, talk about that switch now.DBTrek wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:07 pmHey, I'm not trying to open the gates to some Mel Gibson type shit here. I'm just trying to figure out why saying AIPAC donates to politicians to influence policy is racist, but saying any other special interest do the same is not. The NAACP and the AARP donate to politicians to influence policy. Is saying that racist/ageist?clubgop wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:01 pm
It plays into a Jewish stereotype about jew sheckles or jew gold, she might as well have said something about bloody matzohs. Had she just said AIPAC should would've been fine, but jew money. Forget it, skull drag her ass too. Rule number 4. The fact Nuke is the only backing you should concern you.
Look, if you were to banish my ass to the ME and allow me to choose the country I went to, it would be Israel, hands down. I'm not anti-Jew or anti-Israel. I'm just trying to understand why saying politicians are in AIPAC's pocket is suddenly anti-semitic?
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: What Now, Jewspiracy Theorists?
Because the Nazis surely would have let her keep it and publish it, fucking dumbass.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio