Fife wrote: ↑Thu Jun 28, 2018 12:24 pmNo matter what the trial is about, most every seasoned trial lawyer would tell you that on the morning of trial, the opposing attorneys would be happy to get together in private after initial voir dire and eliminate the 30% of the pool who really DON'T want to be involved in the trial (no matter what it is about) and the 30% who really DO want to be involved in the trial (no matter what it is about). This is regarding the very small minority of cases filed that actually have to have a jury trial to resolve. 60% of the fuckers in the jury pool are so screwed up that they don't help either contestant, and everybody involved in conducting the trial knows it.
Now try explaining to them why super complicated product A infringes the tortured and verbose recitations of independent Claim 1.
We've pretty much given up on arguing the law to juries in the Patet realm - they're just too fucking stupid....it's all about the narrative now