Single Mother Fired for Giving Trump the Finger is Suing Employer

[nmoore63]

The 19th does seem to have been a mistake in hindsight, though. Come on.

No women into white supremacy?

[C-Mag]

Here's Briskman's Facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/juli.briskman


Looks like she's likely a butthurt Hillary voter
Likes
Rock 'n' Roll Marathon Series, Healthcare for All Virginians Coalition, Christy Jenkins Beauty & Style, Virginia Civic Engagement Table, Naacp Loudoun, Holy & Whole Life Changing Ministries, International, Loudoun Freedom Center, NBC News, Delegate Wendy Gooditis, ThinkProgress, Friends of Phyllis Randall, CNN, Adam Schiff, We Are Not A Number, Brad Show Liveand more

Has a degree in Journalism and an MBA in Marketing, was working for around min wage

She should have been fired for her favorite book being Haiku Cats.

[Speaker to Animals]

The 19th does seem to have been a mistake in hindsight, though. Come on.

No women into white supremacy?

I don't know about white supremacy -- seems kind of silly, honestly -- but if you look at the impact of women voters on America.. it's not good at all. And if you look at what women are doing now with their disproportionate power, it doesn't reflect well upon them as a group at all.

[nmoore63]

The 19th does seem to have been a mistake in hindsight, though. Come on.

No women into white supremacy?

I don't know about white supremacy -- seems kind of silly, honestly -- but if you look at the impact of women voters on America.. it's not good at all. And if you look at what women are doing now with their disproportionate power, it doesn't reflect well upon them as a group at all.

How is that relevant to whether or not their enfranchisement was the morally correct decision?

[Speaker to Animals]

No women into white supremacy?

I don't know about white supremacy -- seems kind of silly, honestly -- but if you look at the impact of women voters on America.. it's not good at all. And if you look at what women are doing now with their disproportionate power, it doesn't reflect well upon them as a group at all.

How is that relevant to whether or not their enfranchisement was the morally correct decision?

I think the notion that everybody should be enfranchised is morally repugnant. The only people who should be enfranchised are people with an actual stake in the country who actually contribute and sacrifice for it. If women do those things, then I would be okay with those women voting. I'd even disenfranchise myself if it meant ending this farce.

[nmoore63]

We should start by disenfranchising those without property first. Women property owners are fine.

[Fife]

Skin in the Game

[Speaker to Animals]

We should start by disenfranchising those without property first. Women property owners are fine.

Depends upon what we are talking about here.

If we put the federal government back to its original intent, then the only people with "skin in the game" at the federal level are veterans.

At the state level, the people with skin in the game are property owners.

Mixing that up is a another recipe for failure. If you want to know what it looks like for non-veteran property owners making decisions on war and peace, then look no further than John Bolton. Property owners would just as gleefully toss veterans into pointless foreign wars, and you'd still get a class of useless generals in the Pentagon pandering to those kinds of assholes.

Likewise, just giving the vote at the state level is still a good recipe for high property taxes for the gibs train if veterans don't overwhelmingly own property.

Just divide the government up according to strictly separated roles and enfranchise in each level of government according to skin in the game. That's all I am saying.

Obviously, women overwhelmingly would be disenfranchised because they don't sacrifice shit, they don't serve by and large, and they sure as shit don't as a group run a positive tax surplus. They are, in fact, the very worst demographic to enfranchise just on account of them being whoever they are.

[nmoore63]

Skin in the Game

Disenfranchise everyone on payments from the state?

Net tax payers only?

Fair enough.

[nmoore63]

If we put the federal government back to its original intent, then the only people with "skin in the game" at the federal level are veterans.

What misguided history book taught you this fallacy?