Super Bowl LII Thread

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25283
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Super Bowl LII Thread

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:26 pm

Montegriffo wrote:Ouch, Glasgow kiss to the crown jewels. That's gotta hurt.
His own fault. You can’t just jog around in the middle of the field like that. No idea what he was thinking.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Super Bowl LII Thread

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:29 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:Ouch, Glasgow kiss to the crown jewels. That's gotta hurt.
His own fault. You can’t just jog around in the middle of the field like that. No idea what he was thinking.
I was talking about the guy who tried to jump over the tackler.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25283
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Super Bowl LII Thread

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:38 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:Ouch, Glasgow kiss to the crown jewels. That's gotta hurt.
His own fault. You can’t just jog around in the middle of the field like that. No idea what he was thinking.
I was talking about the guy who tried to jump over the tackler.
Oh that was a dumb move as well lol
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25283
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Super Bowl LII Thread

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:41 pm

The Vikings going to Minneapolis was the best commercial by far, to this point. Laughed my ass off.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Super Bowl LII Thread

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:46 pm

You should watch the BBC coverage, no ads at all.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25283
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Super Bowl LII Thread

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:53 pm

Montegriffo wrote:You should watch the BBC coverage, no ads at all.
I can’t. But even if I could, the commercials are half the fun.

I don’t watch them the rest of the season tho.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Super Bowl LII Thread

Post by TheReal_ND » Sun Feb 04, 2018 6:00 pm

Montegriffo wrote:You should watch the BBC coverage, no ads at all.
The commercials are a big deal. They always have been.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Super Bowl LII Thread

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Feb 04, 2018 6:00 pm

Is the receiver allowed to pass the ball?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Super Bowl LII Thread

Post by TheReal_ND » Sun Feb 04, 2018 6:01 pm

Montegriffo wrote:Is the receiver allowed to pass the ball?
Laterally or back.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Super Bowl LII Thread

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Feb 04, 2018 6:08 pm

TheReal_ND wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:Is the receiver allowed to pass the ball?
Laterally or back.
The Eagle player who ran almost to the touchline had 2 guys in support against a single defender. He could have passed.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image