DrYouth wrote:Smitty-48 wrote:Not paying any attention to Iran, no interest, they don't have ICBM's, so they can go fuck themselves.
The Iranians are the Israelis problem, why would we care? Are you a Jew?
Shouldn't you be more worried about India? What with you kneedippers electing a Sikh nationalist as leader of your party, now we've got the Indians pissed off at us. Bad for business that.
I don't care really...
Just aware that the middle east is a hornet''s nest of geopolitics.
I guess if Trump tears it up Iran, is going back to it's nuclear ambitions... not really sure that adds up to anything very interesting tho.
Maybe that's fine... no idea... that's why I'm asking you.
I seriously doubt that Iran has in fact given up their nuclear ambitions, I would suspect that they are simply buying themselves time in the near term, to stave off the effects of American sanctions and/or possible military action to interdict them.
As the GOP has rightly pointed out, Iran is continuing to develop their ballistic missile capabilities, and such ballistic missiles are largely useless for all intents and purposes conventional warfare related, can't do much damage with a conventional ballistic missile, so I would accept the assertion that their pursuit of intertheater ballistic missile capablity, is very plausibly the de facto pursuit of intertheater nuclear capability, simply delaying the nuclear component for now, while pursuing the rest of the components in the meantime, parallel development.
Moreover, in terms of the warheads to put on their missiles, the Iranians have viable alternatives to a domestic development program, quite sure Kim Jong Un would be willing to make a deal, oil for nukes, why wouldn't he? No doubt the North Koreans intend to leverage their nuclear capabilities, in far more ways than simply deterring an attack against them, it's their all purpose ace in the hole, nukes open up all sorts of doors for them, one stop shopping.