Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

[Okeefenokee]

I thought this was about that professor in Washington.

[TheReal_ND]

Too many Weinsteins running around this place

[de officiis]

I thought this was about that professor in Washington.

That was Brett

[C-Mag]

What, no thread on Weinstein yet?

There are so many angles to this story. I can't believe we aren't killing it already.

OK kids, here we go . . .

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/?s=WEINSTEIN

‘He’s one schmuck’: Rob Reiner’s response to Harvey Weinstein scandal less than woke

Harvey Weinstein Urged Clinton Campaign to Silence Sanders’s Black Lives Matter Message

Hacked emails show that movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, a longtime ally of Hillary Clinton and a major fundraiser for her 2016 campaign, urged her campaign team to silence rival Bernie Sanders’s message against police shootings of African-Americans. He suggested countering it with “the Sandy Hook issue” — a reference to Sanders’s opposition to lawsuits against gun manufacturers.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10 ... ass-video/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10 ... ign=buffer

http://variety.com/2015/film/news/ashle ... 201610666/

I was going to bring this up in the threat about why Stalinism gets treated with kid gloves.

Same thing here, Ol Harvey is an ally on the Lefty media so they go easy on him. Hoping the crimes will soon be forgotten.

[Speaker to Animals]

I think so many people *want* for this story to be true that they are willing to overlook all the problems with it. This story could easily blow up just like all the other NYT fake news. There's nothing here.

All you have to do to create a story like this is publish an article in something like the NYT about a very successful man having allegedly sexually assaulted women. Find a couple of washed-up women that had some remote contact with him to make the allegation. Then you just sit back and watch as more and more women come forward with their own victimization stories.

That's not to say he is necessarily innocent. I am just saying it's all too easy to create these kinds of stories. This guy is a the perfect fall guy because republicans want to see him burn and the democrats are going all-out against OWGs in their ranks, and just because he had a bar mitzva doesn't exempt him from the OWG label as far as these people are concerned.

I have LONG since passed the point where I automatically disbelieve these high-profile, salacious hit pieces. Show me the evidence. Keep you unsubstantiated allegations. No, I don't "believe her" just because she made an accusation and she has a vagina. Better yet, if you have evidence, take it to the police instead of trying to capitalize upon it in the media.

[Speaker to Animals]

In other words, stop throwing men under the bus based on no evidence just because you *want* a story to fit whatever narrative you are trying to push. It's become too easy to condemn men for heinous crimes based on zero evidence.

[DBTrek]

Did women level an accusation?

Queue StA for some male on male white knighting,



Nevermind the dude has been paying out sexual harassment settlements for years.

[Speaker to Animals]

It's called self-preservation and looking out for one's own self-interests. You should try it sometime.

You live in a society where the more successful you are, the more likely you can be ruined by women making unsubstantiated allegations in public, and a lying media will run with it. It has already reached the point where successful men in the tech industry have to make sure tbey are never alone anywhere with women at tech conferences.

We live in an age where Rolling Stone can publish bullshit they never bothered to fact check, and your reputation is ruined, if you are not locked in a cage.

Weinstein might be a horrible man. I do not know him. If he commited crimes, take the evidence to the police. The NYT is no place to prosecute people for crimes and their reputation is shit anyway.

I automatically disbelieve anything they publish without strict, material proof therein.

[DBTrek]

I don't think rushing to the aid of Bill Cosby, Anthony Weiner, or Harvey Weinstein somehow protects "my interests".
The opposite, in fact.

[Speaker to Animals]

Destroying a man based on the unsubstantiated allegations you take as fact simply because they were made by women is how you get witch trials (literally).

Weinstein may or may not be a loathsome character. I do not know the man. But just.as the ACLU defends the rights of Nazis, a group whose ideas they oppose, to speak freely, you ought to be willing to defend the rights of the Weinsteins of the world to not be destroyed based on unsubstantiated allegations.

There have been men condemned to decades in prison for crimes they did not commit where the only evidence was the baseless allegations of women. The fraternity members that the Rolling Stone defamed faced prison time for the baseless allegations made by "Jacky". The Duke lacrosse team was totally ruined by a false rape accusation.

You have a duty and obligation to grow up and take a stand for equality before the law and justice. Because this well could be you too in the future, and the only people who will defend you are people like me, while those who share your zeal for ruining men in modern witch trials will gleefully throw you right under the bus.