Deadly Diversity

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Deadly Diversity

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Aug 24, 2017 8:31 am

Okeefenokee wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:They couldn't find a black stuntwoman, so they pressed someone into service that didn't know what she was doing? Sounds almost like a murder case :lol:

But the problem is hiring practices, not that there aren't any fucking black stuntwomen?
Learn to read, ffs.

They had a black stunt woman who wasn't up to the stunt, and rather than get someone else who could do it, but wasn't a black woman, they went with the woman who wasn't qualified because,
The producers put pressure to have somebody of the same sex and ethnicity in a position she wasn’t qualified to be in
That's not "affirmative action", it's good film-making. You should match the actor's general look for stunt shots.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: Deadly Diversity

Post by Hastur » Thu Aug 24, 2017 8:42 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Okeefenokee wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:They couldn't find a black stuntwoman, so they pressed someone into service that didn't know what she was doing? Sounds almost like a murder case :lol:

But the problem is hiring practices, not that there aren't any fucking black stuntwomen?
Learn to read, ffs.

They had a black stunt woman who wasn't up to the stunt, and rather than get someone else who could do it, but wasn't a black woman, they went with the woman who wasn't qualified because,
The producers put pressure to have somebody of the same sex and ethnicity in a position she wasn’t qualified to be in
That's not "affirmative action", it's good film-making. You should match the actor's general look for stunt shots.
No reason to match looks anymore. Body shape perhaps but you can fix the face and skin in post. Safety should come first. No movie is worth dying for.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Deadly Diversity

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Aug 24, 2017 8:45 am

Hastur wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Okeefenokee wrote:
Learn to read, ffs.

They had a black stunt woman who wasn't up to the stunt, and rather than get someone else who could do it, but wasn't a black woman, they went with the woman who wasn't qualified because,
That's not "affirmative action", it's good film-making. You should match the actor's general look for stunt shots.
No reason to match looks anymore. Body shape perhaps but you can fix the face and skin in post. Safety should come first. No movie is worth dying for.
Well, from what little I've seen of movie-making, the stunts aren't supposed to be very dangerous anyway.. If this was a technically difficult one, they shouldn't have had an amateur of any kind doing it - I agree.

There is more to this story.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: Deadly Diversity

Post by Hastur » Thu Aug 24, 2017 8:52 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Hastur wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
That's not "affirmative action", it's good film-making. You should match the actor's general look for stunt shots.
No reason to match looks anymore. Body shape perhaps but you can fix the face and skin in post. Safety should come first. No movie is worth dying for.
Well, from what little I've seen of movie-making, the stunts aren't supposed to be very dangerous anyway.. If this was a technically difficult one, they shouldn't have had an amateur of any kind doing it - I agree.

There is more to this story.
If you read the linked article you will get it. Perhaps.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Deadly Diversity

Post by Okeefenokee » Thu Aug 24, 2017 8:55 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Hastur wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
That's not "affirmative action", it's good film-making. You should match the actor's general look for stunt shots.
No reason to match looks anymore. Body shape perhaps but you can fix the face and skin in post. Safety should come first. No movie is worth dying for.
Well, from what little I've seen of movie-making, the stunts aren't supposed to be very dangerous anyway.. If this was a technically difficult one, they shouldn't have had an amateur of any kind doing it - I agree.

There is more to this story.
No, you just don't know how to read.

The stunt girl was not up to the stunt, but others were.

They went with the one who couldn't do it, because the ones who could do it were the wrong skin color.

The same choice came up in a previous movie, and the crew went with the one that could do the stunt, but had to be painted black to match the actor. That was deemed racist, so this black girl got to die in the name of PC.

Image

Good job, lefties. Your retardation continues to claim lives.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Deadly Diversity

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Aug 24, 2017 8:56 am

Hastur wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Hastur wrote: No reason to match looks anymore. Body shape perhaps but you can fix the face and skin in post. Safety should come first. No movie is worth dying for.
Well, from what little I've seen of movie-making, the stunts aren't supposed to be very dangerous anyway.. If this was a technically difficult one, they shouldn't have had an amateur of any kind doing it - I agree.

There is more to this story.
If you read the linked article you will get it. Perhaps.
I've read it twice now. 5 paragraphs. not a lot of facts.

Is there another page somewhere? Or are we just all going to tee off on our feelz here?
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: Deadly Diversity

Post by Hastur » Thu Aug 24, 2017 9:00 am

Cameron just went back and fixed the face of the stunt double in Terminator 2. No biggie.

http://www.syfy.com/syfywire/james-came ... he-changed
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

heydaralon
Posts: 7571
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: Deadly Diversity

Post by heydaralon » Thu Aug 24, 2017 9:56 am

Hastur wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Okeefenokee wrote:
Learn to read, ffs.

They had a black stunt woman who wasn't up to the stunt, and rather than get someone else who could do it, but wasn't a black woman, they went with the woman who wasn't qualified because,
That's not "affirmative action", it's good film-making. You should match the actor's general look for stunt shots.
No reason to match looks anymore. Body shape perhaps but you can fix the face and skin in post. Safety should come first. No movie is worth dying for.
Transformers Dark side of the Moon would beg to disagree. That movie changed my life in a good way
Shikata ga nai

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Deadly Diversity

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Aug 24, 2017 10:00 am

Matching actors to the gender and race of a character, and the stunt doubles to the gender and race of the actors, does not constitute "affirmative action" to rational adults.

They fucked up because they assigned an inexperienced person to perform a stunt that person was not qualified to perform. Being a stunt double is not like working on an oil rig. Women can be just as capable as men, and obviously race doesn't play a factor in it either. They put an unqualified person in a stunt and it went wrong.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Deadly Diversity

Post by Okeefenokee » Thu Aug 24, 2017 10:08 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:Matching actors to the gender and race of a character, and the stunt doubles to the gender and race of the actors, does not constitute "affirmative action" to rational adults.

They fucked up because they assigned an inexperienced person to perform a stunt that person was not qualified to perform. Being a stunt double is not like working on an oil rig. Women can be just as capable as men, and obviously race doesn't play a factor in it either. They put an unqualified person in a stunt and it went wrong.
Someone is saying the producers wanted her for the stunt over objections from others that she wasn't up to it.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751