I smell a lawsuit coming on, this guy could pretty much not need to work again if he wins.California wrote:It got him fired because it doesn't subscribe to accepted Leftist thoughtsThe Conservative wrote:I'm still trying to figure out what's wrong with the article, and why it got him fired. Constructive Criticism should be allowed both ways in a company like Google.heydaralon wrote:https://assets.documentcloud.org/docume ... hamber.pdf
Discuss. I believe the writer of this got fired from Google.
This is the ultimate SIX HIRBing
Google Memo
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Google Memo
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: Google Memo
I hope he does get fuck you money for his sake
I'd love to fund my retirement this way
I'd love to fund my retirement this way
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Google Memo
Not me, but I'd have the FU money, and spend the rest on family, and travel the world, and just enjoy life. I would rather earn my money, but if a company is stupid enough to fire me over that... fuck... I'll take my pound or so of flesh from them and not think anything of it.California wrote:I hope he does get fuck you money for his sake
I'd love to fund my retirement this way
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:33 am
Re: Google Memo
I wonder if being an outwardly-public Trump voter and supporter would be grounds for getting fired at google.
I mean, wouldn't these sniveling cowards feel "unsafe" from the "violence" of the support?
><><><><><>
The left can destroy a person through RACISM SEXISM NAZI etc., doesn't matter how large one's accomplishments.
Uber guy? gone
Occulus Rift guy? gone
Watson, whi discovery DNA helix? vilified
The british nobel guy? gone
and so on
The right needs people in industry to openly hire these people and give them public redemption
unfortunately the mainstream right is too weak and cowardly to do so
so we have to look further right. it isn't natural for me, a recovering libertarian, but face the facts.
I don't see any other choice. In the future, I will hire a lawyer who is purged from some faggot NYC firm. Serious.
I mean, wouldn't these sniveling cowards feel "unsafe" from the "violence" of the support?
><><><><><>
The left can destroy a person through RACISM SEXISM NAZI etc., doesn't matter how large one's accomplishments.
Uber guy? gone
Occulus Rift guy? gone
Watson, whi discovery DNA helix? vilified
The british nobel guy? gone
and so on
The right needs people in industry to openly hire these people and give them public redemption
unfortunately the mainstream right is too weak and cowardly to do so
so we have to look further right. it isn't natural for me, a recovering libertarian, but face the facts.
I don't see any other choice. In the future, I will hire a lawyer who is purged from some faggot NYC firm. Serious.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Google Memo
We need to take control of our own companies and fire all the progressives from it. If people express those kinds of marxist ideas, then we fire them.
-
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:33 am
Re: Google Memo
I don't do employment law, but I suspect there is not much merit.The Conservative wrote: I smell a lawsuit coming on, this guy could pretty much not need to work again if he wins.
google can say: dude can believe and say what he wants, but the women under his supervision are important to google, and they reported great dissatisfaction/fear/whatever, so we had to make a hard choice, and he had to go. we owe a duty to our investors to protect this talent blah blah
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Google Memo
Trust me, I'm working on that slowly. There are a handful of people here that make the work place toxic... they are being removed, but I got a few targets I am willing to take a shot at myself after yesterday.Speaker to Animals wrote:We need to take control of our own companies and fire all the progressives from it. If people express those kinds of marxist ideas, then we fire them.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Google Memo
They would have to prove their claim by having documentation prior to the document coming out, if they don't they don't have a leg to stand upon.apeman wrote:I don't do employment law, but I suspect there is not much merit.The Conservative wrote: I smell a lawsuit coming on, this guy could pretty much not need to work again if he wins.
google can say: dude can believe and say what he wants, but the women under his supervision are important to google, and they reported great dissatisfaction/fear/whatever, so we had to make a hard choice, and he had to go. we owe a duty to our investors to protect this talent blah blah
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:33 am
Re: Google Memo
this is google. they have smart lawyers. tracks are covered.The Conservative wrote:They would have to prove their claim by having documentation prior to the document coming out, if they don't they don't have a leg to stand upon.apeman wrote:I don't do employment law, but I suspect there is not much merit.The Conservative wrote: I smell a lawsuit coming on, this guy could pretty much not need to work again if he wins.
google can say: dude can believe and say what he wants, but the women under his supervision are important to google, and they reported great dissatisfaction/fear/whatever, so we had to make a hard choice, and he had to go. we owe a duty to our investors to protect this talent blah blah
plus
DOJ is currently investigation google for wage discrimination. Which way does the wind blow?
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Google Memo
Google is going to find themselves in a world of hurt, because I have a feeling we are going to see discrimination in a way we haven't in a corporate environment before out in the open for everyone to see, and to show how dangerous the SJW environment truly is.apeman wrote:this is google. they have smart lawyers. tracks are covered.The Conservative wrote:They would have to prove their claim by having documentation prior to the document coming out, if they don't they don't have a leg to stand upon.apeman wrote:
I don't do employment law, but I suspect there is not much merit.
google can say: dude can believe and say what he wants, but the women under his supervision are important to google, and they reported great dissatisfaction/fear/whatever, so we had to make a hard choice, and he had to go. we owe a duty to our investors to protect this talent blah blah
plus
DOJ is currently investigation google for wage discrimination. Which way does the wind blow?
#NotOneRedCent