Cute strawman. Be a shame if somebody burned it down.StCapps wrote:Not perfect does not equal obsolete, how about you drop that bullshit logic and move on? I'm betting you are too dug into that ridiculous rationale to drop it though, you will continue to indulge in the sunk costs fallacy and make yourself more retarded in the process.GrumpyCatFace wrote:StCapps wrote: Tunneling doesn't render walls obsolete, it's just a way to get passed walls.
Capps. I think we should all take a deep breath here. Just admit that you've made a mistake and move on.
140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: 140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
Whatever bro, anytime anyone brings up a piece of military technology in a thread you participate in, you claim that it's obsolete. That is your schtick to a tee, whether your self awareness allows you to see that or not.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Cute strawman. Be a shame if somebody burned it down.StCapps wrote:Not perfect does not equal obsolete, how about you drop that bullshit logic and move on? I'm betting you are too dug into that ridiculous rationale to drop it though, you will continue to indulge in the sunk costs fallacy and make yourself more retarded in the process.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Capps. I think we should all take a deep breath here. Just admit that you've made a mistake and move on.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: 140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
I argued that entire surface navy is obsolete. Why the hell would that change over a bigger gun?StCapps wrote:Whatever bro, anytime anyone brings up a piece of military technology in a thread you participate in, you claim that it's obsolete. That is your schtick to a tee, whether your self awareness allows you to see that or not.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Cute strawman. Be a shame if somebody burned it down.StCapps wrote:Not perfect does not equal obsolete, how about you drop that bullshit logic and move on? I'm betting you are too dug into that ridiculous rationale to drop it though, you will continue to indulge in the sunk costs fallacy and make yourself more retarded in the process.
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: 140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
People at your border used to get hurt when drug trafficers threw bags of drugs over the fence? A common occurance?
You'd think that building a higher obstacle would make drug throwing even more dangerous.
You'd think that building a higher obstacle would make drug throwing even more dangerous.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
Gravity is a bitch.BjornP wrote:People at your border used to get hurt when drug trafficers threw bags of drugs over the fence? A common occurance?
You'd think that building a higher obstacle would make drug throwing even more dangerous.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: 140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
They've been flying in dope to prisons for a while now. In fact well before the drone craze hit big the last couple years. Of course prison prices are profitable to do that. Going to need a big fucking drone to incentivize air lifting it in like that.
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: 140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
Scots have been practicing for this for a thousand years.
Last edited by SuburbanFarmer on Thu Jul 27, 2017 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: 140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadrian's_Wall
Not quite thousands. But that's ok, not a lot of Scotts in Mexico
Not quite thousands. But that's ok, not a lot of Scotts in Mexico
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: 140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
Ok, centuriesNukedog wrote:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadrian's_Wall
Not quite thousands. But that's ok, not a lot of Scotts in Mexico
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: 140 Lbs. bags of pot tossed over "Border wall".
They did try to set up a colony nearby, though. Might be some holdouts.Nukedog wrote:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadrian's_Wall
Not quite thousands. But that's ok, not a lot of Scotts in Mexico
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751