Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Okeefenokee » Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:18 pm

Remington doesn't make the AR-15. Armalite does.

There is no rigorous mental health screening to join the military.
Adam Lanza chose a simpler path: unfettered access to the Bushmaster.
Whoever wrote this has had too much unfettered access to fermented cat shit.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by clubgop » Sun Mar 05, 2017 10:00 pm

Okeefenokee wrote:Remington doesn't make the AR-15. Armalite does.

There is no rigorous mental health screening to join the military.
Adam Lanza chose a simpler path: unfettered access to the Bushmaster.
Whoever wrote this has had too much unfettered access to fermented cat shit.
The article specified Ranger. So the mental health screening may not be formal but it is rigorous. But you are right the article is shit. They have to lie to make getting a gun seem like a trip to the grocery store. Rigorous mental health screening on an 18 year old entering the military? I'd be more afraid of the fucker that would pass such a thing. But GCF and the other hoplophobes needs to have their heads patted with useless security theater.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Mar 05, 2017 10:05 pm

So I was sitting there on the Group W bench..

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Okeefenokee » Sun Mar 05, 2017 10:09 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:So I was sitting there on the Group W bench..
:lol:

+1000
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:14 pm

I agree the article is shit. Any mental patient is welcome to walk into a gun show and leave with a weapon.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by clubgop » Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:20 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:I agree the article is shit. Any mental patient is welcome to walk into a gun show and leave with a weapon.
No they are not. The gun show loophole doesn't exist you are being a dishonest bitch again. The ISIS sympathizers want to let everyone in the country but a free born American can't defend himself cause dirty dick is afwaid. Protip: NICS sucks ass when it comes to mental health anyway.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by clubgop » Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:25 pm

Okeefenokee wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:So I was sitting there on the Group W bench..
:lol:

+1000
If anyone should get that refrence it should be GCF. But he won't cause syphilis.

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Hastur » Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:13 am

Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:27 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
de officiis wrote:
TheReal_ND wrote:It's a civil suit yes? Maybe I'm confused here.
Yes. Not sure what you mean about surreptitiously undermining the constitution.
He's implying that any sort of restriction or liability on gunmakers would be a complete rejection of the 2nd Amendment.

Typical right-wing nonsense.

That comment right there is why the country needs to split - the fucking manufacturer does not control the actions of the shooter..... The mother is to blame......you're either an idiot or insincere in your criticism of those who see this as a subversive attack on the 2nd....it absolutely is....the parents leading this charge are left wing nuts, even before the shooting.....what you don't see in the news are the parents who realize that this suit is junk and want nothing to do with it......if you think the 2nd is too dangerous of a right, then why not try to repeal it via constitutional amendment as opposed to going through the activists court system.....the courts are only going to make people more jaded and more distrustful of the government......

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:32 am

we have two primary culture who are fundamentally incompatible......time to split....