There is no rigorous mental health screening to join the military.
Whoever wrote this has had too much unfettered access to fermented cat shit.Adam Lanza chose a simpler path: unfettered access to the Bushmaster.
Whoever wrote this has had too much unfettered access to fermented cat shit.Adam Lanza chose a simpler path: unfettered access to the Bushmaster.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
The article specified Ranger. So the mental health screening may not be formal but it is rigorous. But you are right the article is shit. They have to lie to make getting a gun seem like a trip to the grocery store. Rigorous mental health screening on an 18 year old entering the military? I'd be more afraid of the fucker that would pass such a thing. But GCF and the other hoplophobes needs to have their heads patted with useless security theater.Okeefenokee wrote:Remington doesn't make the AR-15. Armalite does.
There is no rigorous mental health screening to join the military.
Whoever wrote this has had too much unfettered access to fermented cat shit.Adam Lanza chose a simpler path: unfettered access to the Bushmaster.
Speaker to Animals wrote:So I was sitting there on the Group W bench..
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
No they are not. The gun show loophole doesn't exist you are being a dishonest bitch again. The ISIS sympathizers want to let everyone in the country but a free born American can't defend himself cause dirty dick is afwaid. Protip: NICS sucks ass when it comes to mental health anyway.GrumpyCatFace wrote:I agree the article is shit. Any mental patient is welcome to walk into a gun show and leave with a weapon.
If anyone should get that refrence it should be GCF. But he won't cause syphilis.Okeefenokee wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:So I was sitting there on the Group W bench..
+1000
GrumpyCatFace wrote:He's implying that any sort of restriction or liability on gunmakers would be a complete rejection of the 2nd Amendment.de officiis wrote:Yes. Not sure what you mean about surreptitiously undermining the constitution.TheReal_ND wrote:It's a civil suit yes? Maybe I'm confused here.
Typical right-wing nonsense.