Nevertheless She Persisted, WTF?!

[The Conservative]

You mean she wasn't censored because of her vagina??

No, it would have been her pussy hat, don't you know?

[PartyOf5]

... also has anyone else noticed the imagery?

What, the giant pink thing through her cleavage?

[TheReal_ND]

There is no reason to believe she was silenced because she is a woman, unless you view every issue through the lens of gender.

Nonetheless, this new feminist rallying cry is ALL OVER my social media.

Democrats are without a leader right now. They are shopping Pocahontas around right now apparently.

[Speaker to Animals]

I heard she gets mean like this whenever she drinks.

[C-Mag]

You guys are trans-racists.

Don't label me, I'm considering calling myself a CIS-RACIST !

[C-Mag]

I heard she gets mean like this whenever she drinks.

Well, that would be just like Hillary.

[Speaker to Animals]

I heard she gets mean like this whenever she drinks.

Well, that would be just like Hillary.

Nah. When Hillary gets like that, I assume it's just the demon talking.

[Dand]

She was censured for this time because she slandered a person on the congressional floor... which is not allowed. It had nothing to do with her gender, or even race (Indian or Caucasian)... it had to do with her opening her mouth at the wrong time at the right place...

I wish the censure was permanent...

She was censored because she is on the other team. Politics as usual.

Actually no, she broke Rule XIX.

http://www.rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RuleXIX

This is a rule that has been around for 100 years, just because it's not enforced as much as it should be, doesn't mean what Warren did should have not been punished.

The Democrats pull our laws for copyright infringement, so what's wrong with doing this?

that was my reaction too when I read an article in the MSM about this yesterday. It kept emphasizing how this rule has not been used very often and implying that therefore the Republicans are being especially sexist and mean.

I've got another interpretation, maybe Elizabeth Warren is such a nasty bitch that she can't follow a rule if it requires her to act with some decency. If this rule is being "historically" used then it's because she managed to be a "historic" bitch. Congrats, Liz.

[The Conservative]

I heard she gets mean like this whenever she drinks.

Well, that would be just like Hillary.

Nah. When Hillary gets like that, I assume it's just the demon talking.

You mean her true self?

[The Conservative]

She was censored because she is on the other team. Politics as usual.

Actually no, she broke Rule XIX.

http://www.rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RuleXIX

This is a rule that has been around for 100 years, just because it's not enforced as much as it should be, doesn't mean what Warren did should have not been punished.

The Democrats pull our laws for copyright infringement, so what's wrong with doing this?

that was my reaction too when I read an article in the MSM about this yesterday. It kept emphasizing how this rule has not been used very often and implying that therefore the Republicans are being especially sexist and mean.

I've got another interpretation, maybe Elizabeth Warren is such a nasty bitch that she can't follow a rule if it requires her to act with some decency. If this rule is being "historically" used then it's because she managed to be a "historic" bitch. Congrats, Liz.

You mean you listen to/read fake news and can come up with another conclusion?! You must be a racist/sexist bigot.