Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25071
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:23 pm

TheReal_ND wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:22 pm
It will take some decades before the live cores in fukishima become inert if ever. There is a huge amount of risk in operating nuclear plants but luckily there seems to be a large enough group with an adequate portion of hubris to convince gen x that the future won't be radiation strewn.
Tough to say whether that’s better or worse than coal stacks and mercury though.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18692
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Jan 17, 2019 1:24 am

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:23 pm
TheReal_ND wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:22 pm
It will take some decades before the live cores in fukishima become inert if ever. There is a huge amount of risk in operating nuclear plants but luckily there seems to be a large enough group with an adequate portion of hubris to convince gen x that the future won't be radiation strewn.
Tough to say whether that’s better or worse than coal stacks and mercury though.
Poor air from coal fired power stations has almost certainly killed more people.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

Post by Hastur » Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:21 am

Even solar panels kill more people than nuclear.
Studies based on World Health Organisation data and other sources found that globally, about 100 people die for each terawatt-hour of electricity produced by coal, 36 from oil, four from natural gas, 0.44 for rooftop solar and 0.04 from nuclear.
https://www.news.com.au/national/south- ... c9f2ecc3fb
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:52 am

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:23 pm
TheReal_ND wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:22 pm
It will take some decades before the live cores in fukishima become inert if ever. There is a huge amount of risk in operating nuclear plants but luckily there seems to be a large enough group with an adequate portion of hubris to convince gen x that the future won't be radiation strewn.
Tough to say whether that’s better or worse than coal stacks and mercury though.

LOL

Add IQ and power plants to the list.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18692
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Jan 17, 2019 10:15 am

Hastur wrote:
Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:21 am
Even solar panels kill more people than nuclear.
Studies based on World Health Organisation data and other sources found that globally, about 100 people die for each terawatt-hour of electricity produced by coal, 36 from oil, four from natural gas, 0.44 for rooftop solar and 0.04 from nuclear.
https://www.news.com.au/national/south- ... c9f2ecc3fb
Shame there is no breakdown. I wonder why it specifies''rooftop'' solar too.
Are the figures made up from accidents during mining for panel components or simply people falling off roofs while installing them?
Neither of which are a direct result of the actual production of energy.
Maybe it is poorly installed panels falling off roofs and hitting people.
Could be deaths during the manufacturing process.

Frustrating not having more information.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25071
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Jan 18, 2019 10:42 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:52 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:23 pm
TheReal_ND wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:22 pm
It will take some decades before the live cores in fukishima become inert if ever. There is a huge amount of risk in operating nuclear plants but luckily there seems to be a large enough group with an adequate portion of hubris to convince gen x that the future won't be radiation strewn.
Tough to say whether that’s better or worse than coal stacks and mercury though.

LOL

Add IQ and power plants to the list.
Image
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

Post by clubgop » Sat Jan 19, 2019 12:17 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:52 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:23 pm
TheReal_ND wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:22 pm
It will take some decades before the live cores in fukishima become inert if ever. There is a huge amount of risk in operating nuclear plants but luckily there seems to be a large enough group with an adequate portion of hubris to convince gen x that the future won't be radiation strewn.
Tough to say whether that’s better or worse than coal stacks and mercury though.

LOL

Add IQ and power plants to the list.
got to start a thread.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

Post by clubgop » Sat Jan 19, 2019 12:19 am

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 10:42 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:52 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 10:23 pm


Tough to say whether that’s better or worse than coal stacks and mercury though.

LOL

Add IQ and power plants to the list.
Image
Dunking on....Yourself?

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

Post by Fife » Fri Sep 06, 2019 6:03 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:28 pm
Thorium
Here's an interesting talk-talk from Kirk Sorensen at https://flibe-energy.com/ directed to a lay audience about the future of Thorium.

https://tomwoods.com/ep-1486-want-abund ... -or-solar/


Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Nuclear Power: Danger Depends on State of Political Appointment

Post by Zlaxer » Fri Sep 06, 2019 7:03 am



It's not a right wing cook idea....