Martin Hash wrote: ↑Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:53 pm
JohnDonne wrote: ↑Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:43 pm
Martin Hash wrote: ↑Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:37 pm
When are the fucking snowflakes going to stop melting every time
Trump is an asshole?
Doesn't make you appear smart or worldly to act like possible witness tampering is NBD.
Plus, why the euphemism "being an asshole?" are you in denial about it or do you agree that it was witness tampering? I've already said there's enough plausible deniability that he won't be held accountable.
Do you know how ridiculous you sound? John, you’re an old-timer and deserve respect. Assume that everyone here will throw
Trump under the bus when and if he ever does anything real, but you damage your own position here when you assume the
Trump-hater line.
It's not
Trump hating to observe that "watch the father in law" is a non-sequitur. That's coupled with Giuliani's statement:
“he’s afraid to testify against his father-in-law, because the repercussions for that will be far worse.”
^^^
This sentence is meaningless except as a threat. Cohen never had any reason to testify against the father in law, the father in law is not on trial, there's no charges pending against the father in law. Why would he have to choose between
Trump and the father in law? Why would it matter if the father in law is in organized crime? Because something will happen to the father in law, is what they're saying.