Well, I've read the original speech, Stalin is basically just rattling off ten places where the Soviets ultimately defeated the Wehrmacht, but he doesn't articulate any particular strategy, the "Ten Strikes" don't amount to much more than him saying "we won here, and here, and here", he doesn't actually state how, why, or from what meansTheReal_ND wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 7:05 pmSmitty, you might enjoy some of Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson's takes on WWII. He's far from conventional but i think thats because he knows Russian and has alternative soutces. Check this out if you get bored and lmk what you think.
Radio Albion: The Orthodox Nationalist: Stalin’s Infamous ‘Ten Strikes’ of 1944 – TON 022620 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RadioAlb ... alins.html
I agree with Grigorenko, that Stalin was poised to attack Germany, and that Hitler preempted him with Barbarossa, though not that Stalin was a complete bust as a leader. Stalin provided a key ingredient, which was terror, Stalin was scarier than Hitler, so that kept the Soviet troops from retreating beyond the Volga.
In terms of General Winter, that does prevent the taking of Moscow in the first year, but really the Germans were brought down by logistics,
Hitler said so himself when meeting with Mannerheim in Finland.