Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:24 am

Nukedog wrote:Image

Great lineup
Boris is keeping his head down after the Iran fuck up, Farage is busy banging his immigrant wife and Jacob Rees-Mogg had to stay home this week to help his nanny choose next weeks neckties.
Who else have you heard of in British politics?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

Post by TheReal_ND » Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:39 am

Besides commie bracelet wearing May? That's about it. Sadhiq Khan I guess.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:52 am

Nukedog wrote:Besides commie bracelet wearing May? That's about it. Sadhiq Khan I guess.
May is known as ''the submarine'' for staying hidden when things are difficult. Don't remember her being on QT since the last election. Khan is on occasionally but he has his Islamic conquest to organise so he's too busy most weeks.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

Post by TheReal_ND » Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:53 am

That's just part and parcel of modern life in Great Britain

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:00 am

Nukedog wrote:That's just part and parcel of modern life in Great Britain
Yup, it's like mass shootings in the US, there is absolutely nothing anyone can do to prevent future attacks. Best thing we can do is search for a scapegoat to blame all our problems on. I blame the Amish.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

Post by TheReal_ND » Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:03 am

I blame the gunless

User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

Post by Ex-California » Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:44 am

Montegriffo wrote:
California wrote: Do you not have commercials on the BBC?
No. The BBC has no adverts and therefore no corporate masters.
You can watch any other TV station online without a licence.
The fee's collected from the licence and selling programs abroad are spent on programming. There is no-one collecting the profits and the government doesn't get it's hands on a single penny. What's not to like?
So the BBC is more or less like HBO?

Your government doesn't steal from itself to fund other things? Here in the US we'd pay a license and none of it would actually go for the TV, it would be lost in the general fund somewhere
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

Post by Hastur » Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:05 pm

California wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
California wrote: Do you not have commercials on the BBC?
No. The BBC has no adverts and therefore no corporate masters.
You can watch any other TV station online without a licence.
The fee's collected from the licence and selling programs abroad are spent on programming. There is no-one collecting the profits and the government doesn't get it's hands on a single penny. What's not to like?
So the BBC is more or less like HBO?

Your government doesn't steal from itself to fund other things? Here in the US we'd pay a license and none of it would actually go for the TV, it would be lost in the general fund somewhere
The point of the license is to keep Public Service independent from government interference. The will get a predictable amount of money no matter what they do.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:09 pm

California wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
California wrote: Do you not have commercials on the BBC?
No. The BBC has no adverts and therefore no corporate masters.
You can watch any other TV station online without a licence.
The fee's collected from the licence and selling programs abroad are spent on programming. There is no-one collecting the profits and the government doesn't get it's hands on a single penny. What's not to like?
So the BBC is more or less like HBO?

Your government doesn't steal from itself to fund other things? Here in the US we'd pay a license and none of it would actually go for the TV, it would be lost in the general fund somewhere
That's the beauty of the licence fee. It has an opt out unlike simply coming out of your taxes like your public broadcaster. If you don't want to pay for the BBC don't buy a licence and don't watch their programs. The money goes to the BBC directly so the gov't can't divert it to one of their pet projects.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
de officiis
Posts: 2528
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am

Re: Common Sense 316 - The Day of the Dove

Post by de officiis » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:14 pm

Nukedog wrote:I blame the gunless
:lol: 8-)
Image