Okeefenokee wrote:It starts on page one and continues from there.DrYouth wrote:23 pages in now...
If I have a chance I will sift through.
(If anyone wants to link to a good page I'll start there.)
For about 24 pages thus far too.
Okeefenokee wrote:It starts on page one and continues from there.DrYouth wrote:23 pages in now...
If I have a chance I will sift through.
(If anyone wants to link to a good page I'll start there.)
This was a good post on page 5...Speaker to Animals wrote:Fife wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:
On one of Dukenog's podcasts last night, an interesting point was made. It was argued that individualism and state centralization go hand-in-hand. They have a point.
Explain, please. I haven't seen dog's post or linked podcasts yet.
If individualism is consistent with state control, I want to read up on it. I'm all ears.
That there was no such concept until after the Enlightenment and it's predilection towards state centralization. That state centralization obliterates kin bonds, community bonds, racial and ethnic bonds, and so on. It does things like create a standing army to maintain its power and prerogatives or seizing control of health care and charitable programs; and in so doing, it eliminates social duties like mustering to a militia, serving the poor in your community, etc.
The very concept of individualism belies a rejection of your social duties to your kin, your community, your ethnic group, and even your nation. This doesn't happen until those duties are removed or become optional.
Yet in creating a highly individualistic, centralized nation state, we also create weakness and sow the seeds for the kinds of dysfunction we experience in our own time.
>burn<heydaralon wrote:Did Dan get the title for this one from his number of downloads?
Burn based on what. This forum must be a tiny portion of his audience.DrYouth wrote:>burn<heydaralon wrote:Did Dan get the title for this one from his number of downloads?
The fact that he is getting multiple interviews all the time kind of shows that he is at least getting his name out there for more people to listen to.Hwen Hoshino wrote:Burn based on what. This forum must be a tiny portion of his audience.DrYouth wrote:>burn<heydaralon wrote:Did Dan get the title for this one from his number of downloads?