Common Sense 319 – A Recipe for Caesar

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

As for the re st of it, you sure use the words Technocrat and Communist together in sentences a lot, but there isn't a lot of actual information in either of those statements.

Go look at the aftermath of The Russian Revolution. That's exactly what happened to useful idiot technocrats, the left eats it's own. You think this is all new, or something?

The technocrats aren't just the new communists, they are old communists as well

I'm sorry, but that reads as a bunch of words strung together almost at random. Technocrats are not "the left." Communist murders or revolutions have nothing to do with Technocrats. You are just using the word Technocrat close to the word Communist, and believing that to be an argument, or, a statement with any meaning at all.

[TheReal_ND]

Yang said Biden would be a better president because he would know how to be more technocrat like. I'm wondering if Biden can even remember his wife's name. Poor old pervert.

[StCapps]

As for the re st of it, you sure use the words Technocrat and Communist together in sentences a lot, but there isn't a lot of actual information in either of those statements.

Go look at the aftermath of The Russian Revolution. That's exactly what happened to useful idiot technocrats, the left eats it's own. You think this is all new, or something?

The technocrats aren't just the new communists, they are old communists as well

I'm sorry, but that reads as a bunch of words strung together almost at random. Technocrats are not "the left." Communist murders or revolutions have nothing to do with Technocrats. You are just using the word Technocrat close to the word Communist, and believing that to be an argument, or, a statement with any meaning at all.

Your grasp of Russian history sucks. The technocrats were indeed on the left, and the technocrats were big supporters of the communists, and then once they helped put the Commies in power, they lined up against the wall and shot them. If you think that is just a bunch of words strung together, it's because you are ignorant of history, and want to defend technocrats for some retarded reason.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Go look at the aftermath of The Russian Revolution. That's exactly what happened to useful idiot technocrats, the left eats it's own. You think this is all new, or something?

The technocrats aren't just the new communists, they are old communists as well

I'm sorry, but that reads as a bunch of words strung together almost at random. Technocrats are not "the left." Communist murders or revolutions have nothing to do with Technocrats. You are just using the word Technocrat close to the word Communist, and believing that to be an argument, or, a statement with any meaning at all.

Your grasp of Russian history sucks. The technocrats were indeed on the left, and the technocrats were big supporters of the communists, and then once they helped put the Commies in power, they lined up against the wall and shot them. If you think that is just a bunch of words strung together, it's because you are ignorant of history, and want to defend technocrats for some retarded reason.

You grasp of the word Technocrat sucks. It is a simple word with a simple definition.

[StCapps]

I'm sorry, but that reads as a bunch of words strung together almost at random. Technocrats are not "the left." Communist murders or revolutions have nothing to do with Technocrats. You are just using the word Technocrat close to the word Communist, and believing that to be an argument, or, a statement with any meaning at all.

Your grasp of Russian history sucks. The technocrats were indeed on the left, and the technocrats were big supporters of the communists, and then once they helped put the Commies in power, they lined up against the wall and shot them. If you think that is just a bunch of words strung together, it's because you are ignorant of history, and want to defend technocrats for some retarded reason.

You grasp of the word Technocrat sucks. It is a simple word with a simple definition.

You ignore the entire history of technocrats, especially after communism came along. To deny most technocrats lean to the left, and push a leftist agenda, both today and in the past, is a laughable understanding of the historical record. Instead you prefer to play semantics and don't want to look at the historical record of their behavior and actions.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Your grasp of Russian history sucks. The technocrats were indeed on the left, and the technocrats were big supporters of the communists, and then once they helped put the Commies in power, they lined up against the wall and shot them. If you think that is just a bunch of words strung together, it's because you are ignorant of history, and want to defend technocrats for some retarded reason.

You grasp of the word Technocrat sucks. It is a simple word with a simple definition.

You ignore the entire history of technocrats, especially after communism came along. To deny most technocrats lean to the left, and push a leftist agenda, both today and in the past, is a laughable understanding of the historical record. Instead you prefer to play semantics and don't want to look at the historical record of their behavior and actions.

As I said, genetic and bandwagon fallacies. You have added absolutely nothing.

[StCapps]

You grasp of the word Technocrat sucks. It is a simple word with a simple definition.

You ignore the entire history of technocrats, especially after communism came along. To deny most technocrats lean to the left, and push a leftist agenda, both today and in the past, is a laughable understanding of the historical record. Instead you prefer to play semantics and don't want to look at the historical record of their behavior and actions.

As I said, genetic and bandwagon fallacies. You have added absolutely nothing.

You have semantics. I have history. That's a landslide victory for me.

You simply wish to put your head in the sand and ignore the obvious failures and shortcomings of "The Best and The Brightest".

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

You ignore the entire history of technocrats, especially after communism came along. To deny most technocrats lean to the left, and push a leftist agenda, both today and in the past, is a laughable understanding of the historical record. Instead you prefer to play semantics and don't want to look at the historical record of their behavior and actions.

As I said, genetic and bandwagon fallacies. You have added absolutely nothing.

You have semantics. I have history. That's a landslide victory for me.

You simply wish to put your head in the sand and ignore the obvious failures and shortcomings of "The Best and The Brightest".

k

[SuburbanFarmer]

Wouldn’t any new technology be ‘progressive’ by nature? How do you invent something new, ‘conservatively’?

Technocrats are certainly not economically left by nature, if that’s the point you’re making... Henry Ford and Howard Hughes come to mind.

[StCapps]

Wouldn’t any new technology be ‘progressive’ by nature? How do you invent something new, ‘conservatively’?

Technocrats are certainly not economically left by nature, if that’s the point you’re making... Henry Ford and Howard Hughes come to mind.

Many technocrats are economically left, but these days it's more socially left, this goes double if the Technocrats are in the government, media or academia. Obviously this does not apply to all of them as if they are a monolith.

Either you are arguing with a strawman, and/or you're ability to observe the political leaning of many technocrats in the past and present is lacking, otherwise there is zero reason to disagree with what I said. Anyone pretending I said they are all lefties to the last man is arguing with Strawman Capps.