547 What Are Taxes Really For?

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: 547 What Are Taxes Really For?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Feb 23, 2019 11:10 am

It occurs to me a clever entrepreneur could take the classic monopoly game, reverse game play, and call it Socialism. The game starts with everybody having random monopolies scattered around the board. Each turn a roll of the dice determines which properties become expended. Each property hit will lose a hotel, then houses, and the rent is always going down. Also each turn some property gets socialized and the player forfeits ownership and no rent is paid, but all the development on the property drops each turn until there is nothing there and if anybody lands on it when all the properties fall apart, they go to jail.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18237
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: 547 What Are Taxes Really For?

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Feb 23, 2019 11:55 am

Socialists don’t play competitive games.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: 547 What Are Taxes Really For?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Feb 23, 2019 11:59 am

The good news about the game of Socialism is that there are no winners. It just goes on and on until all the properties are destroyed and the players are in the gulag.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18237
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: 547 What Are Taxes Really For?

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Feb 23, 2019 12:15 pm

But at least they’re all equal.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

brewster
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm

Re: 547 What Are Taxes Really For?

Post by brewster » Sat Feb 23, 2019 12:43 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Sat Feb 23, 2019 11:10 am
It occurs to me a clever entrepreneur could take the classic monopoly game, reverse game play, and call it Socialism. The game starts with everybody having random monopolies scattered around the board. Each turn a roll of the dice determines which properties become expended. Each property hit will lose a hotel, then houses, and the rent is always going down. Also each turn some property gets socialized and the player forfeits ownership and no rent is paid, but all the development on the property drops each turn until there is nothing there and if anybody lands on it when all the properties fall apart, they go to jail.
Interesting idea, if you're scored on the overall well being of the citizens rather than who's got the assets. Properly done the winner would be the one who hits the sweet spot between the extremes of kleptocracy capitalism, where most people starve, and Marxism, where most people starve.

One way would be tax based, you get your assets taxed, and if it's taxed too high it's foreclosed. It could actually be done with regular monopoly, just with redistributive taxes. You play a certain number of rounds, you can't win if anyone goes broke. If inequality hits a certain benchmark like 10:1, a progressive tax kicks in.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: 547 What Are Taxes Really For?

Post by Fife » Sat Feb 23, 2019 1:47 pm

Muh sweet spot