367 Basic Income is Socialistic

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18245
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

367 Basic Income is Socialistic

Post by Martin Hash » Fri Feb 16, 2018 12:13 pm

Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: 367 Basic Income is Socialistic

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:22 pm

Inheritance taxes are socialism, the opposite of Liberty. Make up your mind.
*yip*

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18245
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: 367 Basic Income is Socialistic

Post by Martin Hash » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:26 pm

Most Liberty to Most People

p.s. Read my book.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: 367 Basic Income is Socialistic

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:29 pm

Martin Hash wrote:Most Liberty to Most People

p.s. Read my book.
So you support socialism, if you see it as giving the most liberty, to the most people, and all of a sudden socialism is no longer the opposite of liberty? You make no sense.
*yip*

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18245
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: 367 Basic Income is Socialistic

Post by Martin Hash » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:36 pm

Read my book. If I still don't make any sense then why should we ever argue about it again? Do you think you're going to convince me of something different?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: 367 Basic Income is Socialistic

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:43 pm

Martin Hash wrote:Read my book. If I still don't make any sense then why should we ever argue about it again? Do you think you're going to convince me of something different?
What argument contained within your book explains this contradictory view of socialism? If you won't change your mind when shown the holes in your ideas, since you are overly invested in them because you wrote a book about it, because you overestimated how insightful that idea was, and don't want to burst that bubble, then whatever, that's your problem not mine.
Last edited by StCapps on Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18245
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: 367 Basic Income is Socialistic

Post by Martin Hash » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:47 pm

StCapps wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:Read my book. If I still don't make any sense then why should we ever argue about it again? Do you think you're going to convince me of something different?
What argument contained within your book explains this contradictory view of socialism?
Maybe none? How R U going to know without reading it?

Listen, either me, Wysest Myn in the Wyrld, is wrong, or you R? If it's me then all those accomplishments & experience pale in comparison to the "common sense" you picked up watching hockey.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: 367 Basic Income is Socialistic

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:48 pm

Martin Hash wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:Read my book. If I still don't make any sense then why should we ever argue about it again? Do you think you're going to convince me of something different?
What argument contained within your book explains this contradictory view of socialism?
Maybe none? How R U going to know without reading it?

Listen, either me, Wysest Myn in the Wyrld, is wrong, or you R? If it's me then all those accomplishments & experience pale in comparison to the "common sense" you picked up watching hockey.
You are wrong. Those accomplishments and experience that you have don't make any half baked idea that you have a good one, that's not how accomplishments and experience work. Whenever you have no argument, you tell people to read your book and defer to your credentials.
*yip*

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18245
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: 367 Basic Income is Socialistic

Post by Martin Hash » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:52 pm

StCapps wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:
StCapps wrote:What argument contained within your book explains this contradictory view of socialism?
Maybe none? How R U going to know without reading it?

Listen, either me, Wysest Myn in the Wyrld, is wrong, or you R? If it's me then all those accomplishments & experience pale in comparison to the "common sense" you picked up watching hockey.
You are wrong. Those accomplishments and experience that you have don't make any half baked idea that you have a good one, that's not how accomplishments and experience work. Whenever you have no argument, you tell people to read your book and defer to your credentials.
Okay, that's fine, I literally don't care if I convince you of anything or not. I offer what I got, if you don't want it, that's on you.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: 367 Basic Income is Socialistic

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 16, 2018 1:59 pm

Martin Hash wrote:
StCapps wrote:
Martin Hash wrote: Maybe none? How R U going to know without reading it?

Listen, either me, Wysest Myn in the Wyrld, is wrong, or you R? If it's me then all those accomplishments & experience pale in comparison to the "common sense" you picked up watching hockey.
You are wrong. Those accomplishments and experience that you have don't make any half baked idea that you have a good one, that's not how accomplishments and experience work. Whenever you have no argument, you tell people to read your book and defer to your credentials.
Okay, that's fine, I literally don't care if I convince you of anything or not. I offer what I got, if you don't want it, that's on you.
Right back at you. You know your argument doesn't hold up, so you duck the argument to protect your ego, and pat yourself on the back because you are more accomplished than whoever you are arguing against. Just because you have credentials, that doesn't mean you know everything, protip.
*yip*