Redefinitions From The Left

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:20 am

Says the dude with the same financial suggestions as an infomercial or the Home Shopping Network.

Got any other hot stock tips old timer? I hear the Nevada silver boom makes can make a feller rich.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Fife » Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:38 am

I wouldn't worry about it much if I were you. Check out some Netflix.

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:42 am

Why?

You wanna chill bro?
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25129
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue Sep 26, 2017 12:39 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Fife wrote:TL;DR quick rundown of the debate level of MHF monetary policy discussions:



:twisted: :lol:

The last one might be a keeper.
Would smash with compound interest. :D
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by DBTrek » Tue Sep 26, 2017 8:15 pm

Image

The trick to building a successful narrative is covering your bases. Make sure all divergent paths ultimately lead to the correct destination.
;)

:lol:
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28124
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by C-Mag » Tue Sep 26, 2017 8:26 pm

DBTrek wrote:Image

The trick to building a successful narrative is covering your bases. Make sure all divergent paths ultimately lead to the correct destination.
;)

:lol:
Several years ago I considered classifying myself on race as Other, and just put Eastern European. White or Eastern European would be correct. Had I done that, would I still be a Racist :think:
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Okeefenokee » Tue Sep 26, 2017 8:38 pm

Fife wrote:TL;DR quick rundown of the debate level of MHF monetary policy discussions:



:twisted: :lol:
I thought I posted that weeks ago.

Maybe not.

Okay, here's one.

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:42 pm



This doesn't make a lick of sense.

Even if we were able to maintain our economic growth with our currency tied to precious metals (a dubious counterfactual), he seems to suggest that a minimum wage of 1.25$ would have 17$ worth of purchasing power today, blaming the FED for diminished wages. But why would the value of precious metals perform better than notes for exchange in a growth economy? The totem of exchange is irrelevant to the exchange value. I doubt the precious metal fetishists would support the price controls needed to make this videos claim comprehensible, much less true. All else being equal, this would simply devalue precious metals relative to goods, or cause people to be paid in ever decreasing increments of precious metal.

As for "fixing the currency" by reattaching it to precious metals: how is this supposed to be achieved? It certainly wouldn't improve the purchasing power of notes, it would only make tiny amounts of precious metals absurdly valuable compared to notes. This doesn't 'fix' anything, wage-wise. And before you metal hoarders go creaming your jeans at the prospect, there is absolutely no way the government would do this without purchasing back all precious metals from citizens at the current price, USD, before initiating this plan.

Not basing notes on precious metals doesn't make their value less real, or even inherently less stable. Exchange value is exchange value, and stability is based on confidence in future value regardless of the exchange or the medium of exchange.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:53 pm

No, dummy. He's saying that minimum wage before they took us off silver coinage was worth what today is $17 because of the intrinsic value of the coins. Had we not removed silver from coins, people would have been melting our coins down for the silver since the silver was worth more than the face value of the coins due to the fact that the dollar is no longer tied to gold and the Fed has been printing so much of it it's value is actually declining. They HAD to remove silver from the coins so that we would still have coins at all.


The point he was making was that the value of your money keeps declining, and you are being robbed by-the-by through the bankers printing their funny money nonstop, which they couldn't easily have done before.

It really doesn't matter in principle what you tie the value of a money to. The idea is that you want to tie money to something with intrinsic worth so that the government can't fuck you right in your cucked asshole with "quantitative easing". You probably want something that is not perishable, but I have seen some proposals that want to base it on other commodities besides precious metals. In general, you want to use commodities whose total supply remains relatively fixed or, if it can grow, can only grow in a controlled fashion. Bitcoin gets the latter point right, but alas, prime numbers have no intrinsic value so that's a wash.

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Redefinitions From The Left

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:09 am

I understand that. It is stupid.
The coins have no intrinsic value. Only exchange value.
The value of money can decline regardless.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen