Feminism
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Feminism
Hey Ladies, meet the oppressive male patriarchy, Apple and Google, developers of the Absher App for Saudi Arabia
We should start using this in the US. Keep track of women and make sure they do what they are told.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... women.html
We should start using this in the US. Keep track of women and make sure they do what they are told.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... women.html
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Feminism
That's actually a cool idea for teenagers, though. But it likely can be circumvented rather easily (or they just leave the phone in their bedroom).
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Feminism
Based!
Putin Thanks Women For Taking Care Of The Home And Staying Beautiful On International Women’s Day
Putin Thanks Women For Taking Care Of The Home And Staying Beautiful On International Women’s Day
“You manage everything at work and at home, whilst staying beautiful, bright, and charming,” Putin said, adding that “It is hard to imagine the history and development of our country without the contribution of the great Russian women.”
“What does a young woman need to maintain her figure? Three things: a workout machine, a masseuse and a suitor,” Putin told the police officers.
. . .
“Our women’s ability to achieve success is remarkable. You manage to cope with everything at work and take care of the family. Your love unites, encourages, supports, consoles makes us feel warm,” reported Russian state news agency TASS on Putin’s official comments.
“You are destined to go the whole way of creating new life – the miracle of childbirth. This great happiness of motherhood and child-rearing transfigures this world, fills it with kindness, gentleness and sympathy and asserts the traditional values that have always made Russia strong,” Putin said.
“We shall be always indebted to you,” Putin said in his address to the women of the nation. “This is true of each of us and of the state in general, which remains obliged to do so much for the sake of those who spare no effort in rearing their children.
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: Feminism
The Arabs got some shit rightC-Mag wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 8:11 pmHey Ladies, meet the oppressive male patriarchy, Apple and Google, developers of the Absher App for Saudi Arabia
We should start using this in the US. Keep track of women and make sure they do what they are told.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... women.html
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Feminism
The funny think is Apple and Google are filled with Feminazis that are helping oppress other women.California wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2019 11:20 amThe Arabs got some shit rightC-Mag wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 8:11 pmHey Ladies, meet the oppressive male patriarchy, Apple and Google, developers of the Absher App for Saudi Arabia
We should start using this in the US. Keep track of women and make sure they do what they are told.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... women.html
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 4149
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Feminism
Women holding other women accountable for this repulsive epidemic.
-
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm
Re: Feminism
Yup, and the solution is actually simple - mandatory DNA testing at birth.
Women will never vote for that though, just like with pre-nups "if he needs that then he doesn't trust me or our relationship".
I've had this conversation with quite a few women, at least when it comes to martiage/pre-nup the guy is dodging the bullet, "it you need a pre-nup you don't trust me, it's over, no way I'm marrying you". Ok then. But when it comes to children wanting a DNA test it's "you don't trust me, it's over, I'm filing for divorce" and either way the guy is screwed - regardless of DNA he loses 1/2 of everything and might owe alimony on top of it, and if the child actually is his he's gonna owe child support on top. Most women biologically understand - the woman always 100% knows the child is hers (it grew inside her), the man never *truly* can be 100% sure unless they're stranded on an island with no other men - yet emotionally they don't like feeling untrusted.
If it were government mandated that a DNA test happened at birth, regardless, it would remove that... It's not about the man (not) trusting her, it'd be about the state protecting the rights of the man to not be falsely made "father" and being held financially responsible for a child that he didn't father. His name doesn't go on a birth certificate without a DNA test - although I would add that if he, or his own free will, decides to be cucked and accept the fatherhood for the child then effectively it could be treated as an adoption (he is voluntarily accepting the future financial burden).
If he's not the father and they are legally married he'll still be screwed by no-fault divorce in the courts, but at least he won't be stuck paying child support on top of it.
Ideally it would also act as discouragement for women, it'd put a price on their cheating.
Women will never vote for that though, just like with pre-nups "if he needs that then he doesn't trust me or our relationship".
I've had this conversation with quite a few women, at least when it comes to martiage/pre-nup the guy is dodging the bullet, "it you need a pre-nup you don't trust me, it's over, no way I'm marrying you". Ok then. But when it comes to children wanting a DNA test it's "you don't trust me, it's over, I'm filing for divorce" and either way the guy is screwed - regardless of DNA he loses 1/2 of everything and might owe alimony on top of it, and if the child actually is his he's gonna owe child support on top. Most women biologically understand - the woman always 100% knows the child is hers (it grew inside her), the man never *truly* can be 100% sure unless they're stranded on an island with no other men - yet emotionally they don't like feeling untrusted.
If it were government mandated that a DNA test happened at birth, regardless, it would remove that... It's not about the man (not) trusting her, it'd be about the state protecting the rights of the man to not be falsely made "father" and being held financially responsible for a child that he didn't father. His name doesn't go on a birth certificate without a DNA test - although I would add that if he, or his own free will, decides to be cucked and accept the fatherhood for the child then effectively it could be treated as an adoption (he is voluntarily accepting the future financial burden).
If he's not the father and they are legally married he'll still be screwed by no-fault divorce in the courts, but at least he won't be stuck paying child support on top of it.
Ideally it would also act as discouragement for women, it'd put a price on their cheating.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am