Your OP was presumably meant to generate discussion... and I am discussing.Martin Hash wrote:Dude, that was humor intended to introduce the counterpoint. You could have smiled to yourself or even offered a short funny rejoinder.
Here's the gist of the OP which you seem to be intentionally obtuse about (other posters in this thread get it). Testosterone gives men the advantage of aggression & competitiveness vs. women (in a general Bell Curve sense). We are immersed in it since childhood, royally kick-started in puberty, and finely honed during our formative years. (Some aren't, we men call them "pussies.") In most settings where women claim discrimination, they simply don't recognize they are out-testosteroned, but the men do.
We're you hoping for generic endorsements?
Certainly raw aggression and dominance is the domain of men.
But status has more to it than this as does respect.
You celebrating your superiority over women in the domain of masculine aggression comes off as self congratulatory... just sayin'.
(And listing "tattling" and grade 7 gym class makes your OP seem as if it is based on grade school resentments.)
That all being said... you probably have a point in specific cases... I can see where confusion can arise as can problematic entitlement in situations where masculine dominance defines the role and the pay-grade.