That's one way to take first-person testimony, I suppose...Martin Hash wrote:Marxism does provide a sense of perverse satisfaction to Losers.
Reverse China
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Reverse China
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:56 pm
Re: Reverse China
The productivity will be in the robots. The time will come when the least capable robot is more productive than 90% of Americans. So what do you do then? Tell the 300 million to lay down and die?Martin Hash wrote:One of my First Tenets is: productivity must exceed consumption. In the 300 million unemployed situation, that axiom would be violated because certainly all the productivity would be somewhere else, with America simply printing the money & flashing big military penis.
They might object.
Still got my foreskin thanks for asking. - Montegriffo.
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:05 pm
Re: Reverse China
Egalitarianism is great except that the ability for the individual to take risks, entrepreneurial risks for example. Plus, look at everything else that came with living under Marxism in Russia in the "good old days"... Great for those who were obedient to the state... not so much for everyone else.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Actually, the vast majority of Russian/Lithuanian ex-pats that I've spoken with long for the 'good old days' in the USSR. Sure, the economy sucked, but the culture was extremely egalitarian, and family was the center of their lives. Sort of how we pine for when 'America was great'.nickle7 wrote:People may think they want Marxism. But once they're experiencing it, I doubt they'd still want it. This may sound too objective but where and when have people under Marxist rule honestly been able to say that they liked it? We'd be pretty hard pressed to come up with and answer.
Seek how to think, not what to think.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Reverse China
I'm not arguing in favor of establishing Marxism in American in 2016.nickle7 wrote:Egalitarianism is great except that the ability for the individual to take risks, entrepreneurial risks for example. Plus, look at everything else that came with living under Marxism in Russia in the "good old days"... Great for those who were obedient to the state... not so much for everyone else.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Actually, the vast majority of Russian/Lithuanian ex-pats that I've spoken with long for the 'good old days' in the USSR. Sure, the economy sucked, but the culture was extremely egalitarian, and family was the center of their lives. Sort of how we pine for when 'America was great'.nickle7 wrote:People may think they want Marxism. But once they're experiencing it, I doubt they'd still want it. This may sound too objective but where and when have people under Marxist rule honestly been able to say that they liked it? We'd be pretty hard pressed to come up with and answer.
Just countering the previous point that "You'd totally hate it if you were there".
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:05 pm
Re: Reverse China
Ha yeah, gotcha. I guess I'm just not convinced that the majority of people would like it.GrumpyCatFace wrote:I'm not arguing in favor of establishing Marxism in American in 2016.nickle7 wrote:Egalitarianism is great except that the ability for the individual to take risks, entrepreneurial risks for example. Plus, look at everything else that came with living under Marxism in Russia in the "good old days"... Great for those who were obedient to the state... not so much for everyone else.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Actually, the vast majority of Russian/Lithuanian ex-pats that I've spoken with long for the 'good old days' in the USSR. Sure, the economy sucked, but the culture was extremely egalitarian, and family was the center of their lives. Sort of how we pine for when 'America was great'.
Just countering the previous point that "You'd totally hate it if you were there".
Seek how to think, not what to think.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Reverse China
No way to know for sure, really. It's only been attempted under authoritarian regimes. China is a decent test case. I've not met a Chinese expat that considers it oppressive. Even for all of our squealing about conditions there.nickle7 wrote:Ha yeah, gotcha. I guess I'm just not convinced that the majority of people would like it.GrumpyCatFace wrote:I'm not arguing in favor of establishing Marxism in American in 2016.nickle7 wrote:
Egalitarianism is great except that the ability for the individual to take risks, entrepreneurial risks for example. Plus, look at everything else that came with living under Marxism in Russia in the "good old days"... Great for those who were obedient to the state... not so much for everyone else.
Just countering the previous point that "You'd totally hate it if you were there".