DrYouth wrote:Woah there... you just flipped victim status. Discussing one gender as the universal victim will still be a fallacy if you change that gender to male.Speaker to Animals wrote:The primary victims in our society's influence in family life are men and children. Period.
You are doing it because you believe, with some validity, that it is currently set at female... and turn around is fair play.
Do you want to play the victim because some woman have been... or do you want to get rid of automatic victim status for any gender.
It's a statistical fact, DrY. It's men losing their children 8 times out of 10, in divorces predominantly initiated by women for no reason that would be considered justified until no-fault divorce came along. It's men getting locked in cages because they can't afford their indenture. It's men who don't get to see their children because the state doesn't even enforce visitation orders in many cases.
False moral equivalences are a waste of everybody's time. If this were the 1910s, I'd fight for the rights of mothers and their children. Today the injustice inverted.
Ultimately, with feminized men like you, it's not even about fairness at all. It's about maintaining feminism. Just be honest about it for a change.