Most of the stuff these guys think Dan balked on was that Trump was an outsider, and Dan predicted an outsider running within the existing parties would do well. The problem was that he didn't like Trump or the populism it took to actually get the outsider to succeed. They said he balked on free speech by not covering Antifa even when they were at their worst.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 7:49 amLOL.
I've been listening to Dan since before most people knew what a podcast was. You couldn't be more wrong.
He was always anti-war, anti-hate, pro-free speech, pro-third party. Go back to his old episodes circa 2001. You can see it. Whatever you think Dan stood for was just you ascribing your own views to someone else.
But that is a practice common among the self-loathing, so I can see why you did it.
I still don't agree that he balked on all his issues, or that he became a run of the mill democrat. I just think that he doesn't like repeating himself across episodes, so the parts of his philosophy that are still martian are already out there, and much of it has already come to fruition. I don't think Dan balked by not supporting Trump either-- just because Trump was an outsider doesn't mean he has to be liked when you want an outsider, because theres more than one variable in the equation.