Socially liberal Trump = No subversive liberal art against him

User avatar
Cid
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:43 am

Re: Socially liberal Trump = No subversive liberal art against him

Post by Cid » Sat Dec 10, 2016 7:34 am

Hwen Hoshino wrote: Why should Obama make a big deal out of Glenn Beck saying crazy stuff? He floated the idea of excluding Fox News from access while not being interested in giving that access to an another right wing outlet that would make him sweat. Because he is a pussy as no platform motherfucka. What happened to him was not unprecedented, i fail to see why he was pissy about it. You join politics you are part of the black suit thug life.
What happened to him was unprecedented, if you had precedence you would be able to cite it and you can't. No news organization so routinely made up shit to fuck with a president. You know what propaganda looks like? It looks like someone going out and telling people you can't trust him because his middle name is Hussein, he's a secret Muslim and he's coming to take your guns every time there's a mass shooting. Do that and its only a matter of time before the rebel geniuses that copy your work, with a shitty xerox, start to view the world even crazier, and then you get Sandyhook deniers. Fox didn't do that, but you can't build a home without a foundation.

And here's the rub, no one watching SNL is going to see that and think Alec Baldwin's portrayal of Trump = Trump. But fuck you if you think its good to get patriotic Americans looking at their guns and thinking they might have to save the country from a guy just trying to do the impossible job we gave him. Telling people he's complicit in killing Americans, horseshit. It was horseshit when the Truthers were around after 9/11, but msnbc didn't devote months or even days to that crap except to say, "Hey, crazy on the internet, here's the report."

Once you start down that road you open pandora's box and you don't have to take two steps to get to crazy town, its one step for some and a slight lean for others. When you mainstream fear you get Alt-Righters and SJWs. The difference is one has guns and thinks they're saving their country by doing something stupid that could get someone killed, and the other is putting on a dumbass safetypin.

So yeah I think if you act as a tabloid rather than a news outlet you might not be allowed where news outlets get to go. President Trump can feel free not to show up on NBC, or CBS, or whatever. He has no obligation to give interviews.

But if he does he'll be a bigger pussy than Obama because Obama went on Fox anyway.

Your argument is shit, and like most shit arguments is only going to get shittier the further from now we get. People who think one president is going to be or has been egregiously worse than another always look like dumbasses when the country isn't in a 1000 years of darkness.
Last edited by Cid on Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Hwen Hoshino
Posts: 1819
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am

Re: Socially liberal Trump = No subversive liberal art against him

Post by Hwen Hoshino » Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:50 am

Cid wrote:
Hwen Hoshino wrote: Why should Obama make a big deal out of Glenn Beck saying crazy stuff? He floated the idea of excluding Fox News from access while not being interested in giving that access to an another right wing outlet that would make him sweat. Because he is a pussy as no platform motherfucka. What happened to him was not unprecedented, i fail to see why he was pissy about it. You join politics you are part of the black suit thug life.
What happened to him was unprecedented, if had precedence you would be able to cite it and you can't. No news organization so routinely made up shit to fuck with a president. You know what propaganda looks like? It looks like someone going out and telling people you can't trust him because his middle name is Hussein, he's a secret Muslim and he's coming to take your guns every time there's a mass shooting. Do that and its only a matter of time before the rebel geniuses that copy your work, with a shitty xerox, start to view the world even crazier, and then you get Sandyhook deniers. Fox didn't do that, but you can't build a home without a foundation.

And here's the rub, no one watching SNL is going to see that and think Alec Baldwin's portrayal of Trump = Trump. But fuck you if you think its good to get patriotic Americans looking at their guns and thinking they might have to save the country from a guy just trying to do the impossible job we gave him. Telling people he's complicit in killing Americans, horseshit. It was horseshit when the Truthers were around after 9/11, but msnbc didn't devote months or even days to that crap except to say, "Hey, crazy on the internet, here's the report."

Once you start down that road you open pandora's box and you don't have to take two steps to get to crazy town, its one step for some and a slight lean for others. When you mainstream fear you get Alt-Righters and SJWs. The difference is one has guns and thinks they're saving their country by doing something stupid that could get someone killed, and the other is putting on a dumbass safetypin.

So yeah I think if you act as a tabloid rather than a news outlet you might not be allowed where news outlets get to go. President Trump can feel free not to show up on NBC, or CBS, or whatever. He has no obligation to give interviews.

But if he does he'll be a bigger pussy than Obama because Obama went on Fox anyway.

Your argument is shit, and like most shit arguments is only going to get shittier the further from now we get. People who think one president is going to be or has been egregiously worse than another always look like dumbasses when country isn't in a 1000 years of darkness.
Considering the control freak tendencies he has i bet he would had tried to take away the guns if he could. Just look at the madness he unleashed on colleges. A couple of years back democrats would have used Hussein against him. America always had conspiracy theorists. What's the big deal? Who is that we that gave him the job? Half the country does not vote and the press only likes certain people who say the right things. He might not even be there without his Hamilton Project etc connections. What are the specific Benghazi accusations against him? Are you sure your people whoever might be are still mainstream?

What was the respectable right wing publication he wanted to talk to instead what would had made him sweat? The press climate of repub and dem presidents is different. Obama did not deal with mostly hostile press, Trump does. Different tactics. If the press does not fuck up it would not be this unpopular and Trump would not be able to play this game.

i think almost all of these cocksuckers are bad people.
Last edited by Hwen Hoshino on Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Socially liberal Trump = No subversive liberal art against him

Post by TheReal_ND » Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:57 am

i bet he would had try to take away the guns
The rest of your post was immediately discarded for being retarded.