Copy. Capacitors charging, over.DrYouth wrote: ↑
The Wokester ark is starting to list a little...
Doc-lol to the Rail gun!
>sirens sounding<
Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
-
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:10 am
Re: Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
-
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
- Location: Canadastan
Re: Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
I mean... it’s a bunch of woke getting eaten by sharks at this point....
>shrugs<
Fire at will.
>lights cigar<
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am
Re: Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
I'll add an interesting insight a co-worker had while we were discussing defunding the police. He's a former door kicker for the US government, when they were deep in the war on drugs, and later worked for an NGO fighting human trafficking all over the world. A cool guy.
His contention was that what they are attempting to do is defund municipal and county police forces and re-allocate those funds to support the creation of a Federalized police force. It wasn't something that I had considered before, and it sounds plausible to me.
His contention was that what they are attempting to do is defund municipal and county police forces and re-allocate those funds to support the creation of a Federalized police force. It wasn't something that I had considered before, and it sounds plausible to me.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
if not federal replacement of police, at least much more federal enforcementXenophon wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 12:54 pmI'll add an interesting insight a co-worker had while we were discussing defunding the police. He's a former door kicker for the US government, when they were deep in the war on drugs, and later worked for an NGO fighting human trafficking all over the world. A cool guy.
His contention was that what they are attempting to do is defund municipal and county police forces and re-allocate those funds to support the creation of a Federalized police force. It wasn't something that I had considered before, and it sounds plausible to me.
that is definitely part of the overall doctrine of Washington, to wit the states can't be trusted to enforce the law
it is definitely a Reconstruction paradigm, with all the talk of Jim Crow & Reparations
"the Feds need to come in and stop the Klan because local law enforcement wont do it"
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 25248
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
That generally fits with the events so far.
-
- Posts: 2988
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:29 am
Re: Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
James LaFond has said as much as well. We also get to look forward to 60 million more Arab and African immigrants coming over as well. Its best to have a foreign police force to help subjugate the locals. Think Ancient Egypt using Sudanese and Athens using Scythians and on an on.Xenophon wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 12:54 pmI'll add an interesting insight a co-worker had while we were discussing defunding the police. He's a former door kicker for the US government, when they were deep in the war on drugs, and later worked for an NGO fighting human trafficking all over the world. A cool guy.
His contention was that what they are attempting to do is defund municipal and county police forces and re-allocate those funds to support the creation of a Federalized police force. It wasn't something that I had considered before, and it sounds plausible to me.
The good, the true, & the beautiful
-
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:10 am
Re: Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
The democrats are explicitly calling for federal control. Not a US police force, just national guidelines, training and oversight etc.Xenophon wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 12:54 pm
His contention was that what they are attempting to do is defund municipal and county police forces and re-allocate those funds to support the creation of a Federalized police force. It wasn't something that I had considered before, and it sounds plausible to me.
Of course this makes no sense on the face of it. Police departments are a local affair. If single party democrat controlled cities in single party democrat controlled states camt produce the results they want, what makes them think democrats from washington can change things?
Of course they never acknowledge any actual problems, and they dont discuss any actual ideas. They're solving an imaginary problem with an imaginary solution. How rich white people from the suburbs in California came to believe that inner city policing in Chicago is controlled by hicks in south Dakota, rather than poor minorities from those cities voting in tough on crime politicians for decades is the real issue.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
it's a mechanism for deflecting a class war into a race war, no rational discourse is needed in this gangster politicsdoc_loliday wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 3:36 pmOf course they never acknowledge any actual problems, and they dont discuss any actual ideas. They're solving an imaginary problem with an imaginary solution. How rich white people from the suburbs in California came to believe that inner city policing in Chicago is controlled by hicks in south Dakota, rather than poor minorities from those cities voting in tough on crime politicians for decades is the real issue.
it basically comes down to who cheats better at election time, who gets away with cheating more wins
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 25248
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
Bingo.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 4:08 pmit's a mechanism for deflecting a class war into a race wardoc_loliday wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 3:36 pmOf course they never acknowledge any actual problems, and they dont discuss any actual ideas. They're solving an imaginary problem with an imaginary solution. How rich white people from the suburbs in California came to believe that inner city policing in Chicago is controlled by hicks in south Dakota, rather than poor minorities from those cities voting in tough on crime politicians for decades is the real issue.
-
- Posts: 2988
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:29 am
Re: Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Addendum
Creditonalism and HR dept. Dont forget that as well.doc_loliday wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 3:36 pmThe democrats are explicitly calling for federal control. Not a US police force, just national guidelines, training and oversight etc.Xenophon wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 12:54 pm
His contention was that what they are attempting to do is defund municipal and county police forces and re-allocate those funds to support the creation of a Federalized police force. It wasn't something that I had considered before, and it sounds plausible to me.
Of course this makes no sense on the face of it. Police departments are a local affair. If single party democrat controlled cities in single party democrat controlled states camt produce the results they want, what makes them think democrats from washington can change things?
Of course they never acknowledge any actual problems, and they dont discuss any actual ideas. They're solving an imaginary problem with an imaginary solution. How rich white people from the suburbs in California came to believe that inner city policing in Chicago is controlled by hicks in south Dakota, rather than poor minorities from those cities voting in tough on crime politicians for decades is the real issue.
The good, the true, & the beautiful